Comparison Volkswagen Polo and Skoda Fabia. Car comparison Sedan Volkswagen Polo V and Hatchback Skoda Fabia II Fabia or Polo

what better Volkswagen Polo or Skoda Fabia?

Video

Similar articles

1. Skoda Fabia. AT () 2. Volkswagen Polo. AT () I know that POLO has a 6-step automatic machine, and tell me what Fabia? What is more reliable, where to wait from these cars underwater stone?

Find out what better Skoda Fabia or Volkswagen Polo Compared parameters are taken from the official data of manufacturers and you can be sure of their accuracy since we are constantly updating them.

Skoda is a famous Czech car manufacturer. The logo of the company is a stylized arrow and Indian with three feathers, he appeared in 1926. The value and author of the emblem are unknown.

Re: Polo Sedan. VS Skoda Fabia. Anything, but the three-cylinder engine is weak very, and for the capacity of Fabia loses polo.

Search only in headlines. It is better to walk - it is useful for health! Overview Subaru WRX. STI. Although before was the polic with the engine 1.

Comparison of Skoda Fabia and Volkswagen Polo. What's better?

RU Post My World Classmates Games Dating News Search All projects All projects Register Login. Why buy good car Which like? Is it possible to leave the parking not the crossroads, there is no barking bardyurs and there are no signs on the four-band left? Mercedes-Benz E-Class coupe clock? What is better to buy Skoda Fabia or WV POLO?

The taste and color of Fabia and Polo one platform, although Fabia is somewhat more. Polo is the only Volksvagen except LUPO on which most parts to order. It is better to walk - it is useful for health! ROLO is collected on Skoda in cheap equipment, so the assembly and most of the spare parts from the Czech Republic.

For some money Fabia you can buy in a more complete set. And in general, it is eggs in one Volkswagentian basket. Skoda - she is pretty and the design of the polo is full of sucks! If in winter ride around the city, then Opel Corsa is fine, but landing is low. And so the question is rhetorical - type - which car is better than German assembly or RU about the company advertising vacancies. Your browser is outdated. We are constantly adding a new feature in the main project interface.

Unfortunately, old browsers are not able to work efficiently with modern software products. To work correctly, use the latest versions of Chrome browsers, Mozilla Firefox, Opera, Internet Explorer 9 or install the amigo browser. RU Post My World Classmates Games Dating News Search All projects All projects Exit Registration Login Mail.

Mazda2 Maxx V Skoda Fabia V Audi A1

It so happened that in the past two years my family became the owner of two completely new cars and very similar to each other cars: one Skoda Fabia,

the second Volkswagen Polo Hatchback.


Given this, this is such an incredible coincidence, some of my friends, and even happens familiar ladies periodically ask me the questions as follows: Well, how? What's better? What is convenient to ride? Is the service expensive? How does the suspension behave, whether something breaks and so on.
I am absolutely not a specialist in car marketing, but I understand very well in the device and nuances of both of these cars. Therefore, below my personal view on both cars and an attempt to answer the most frequently asked questions.

So two almost same cars, issued at different factories belonging to one concern - VAG. Platforms are the same, i.e. Construction of the suspension, the line of the supplied engines and many other parts are identical. However, the Skoda is 30 cm longer. Accordingly, behind the passengers a lot more space, and the trunk at Skoda is much more good. Salons are also very similar, but again, Skoda, with an absolutely the same design of the front seat adjustment system, adjustments are somewhat larger. I am with my height of 187 cm and could not be found in VW convenient for me setting driver's seatIn Skoda it turned out, it can be said from the first time. Yes, and the side support in the seats Skoda is much more convenient. The quality of plastic in the salons of both cars I will call high, in the cars of the same class in which I had a chance to ride, such as Chevrolet "Lacetti" or "Lanos" plastic is much worse and rattling. Music - in both cars factory audio training. Skoda with the factory tape recorder sounds (subjective) very well. The Volkswagen was bought by the Sony radio tape recorder with an active 7-inch screen, the amplifier in this magnetol is very low quality, the sound is bad - "like bucket". Better when choosing to take more expensive and seemingly simpler "factory" Blaupunkt. The noise insulation of the salon at Volkswagen is noticeably better than the Skoda.

Engine and suspension: Skoda engine is 1.4 l, four-cylinder, VW 1.2 three-cylinder. Both cars have a hand-made transmission in 5 speeds. On both machines, last year went around the city and in long-distance trips. I didn't notice a particularly big difference. Fuel consumption is about the same, around the city about 7.8 liters, "on the track" less than 6 liters a hundred km. Noticed one feature, sometimes it seems that the polo with a motor of less power when the speed set from 80 to 110 behaves more than more powerful Skoda. The explanation in apparently better selected Motor 1.2 L gearboxes in the gearbox. The suspension in both cars is "unhappy", it was rapidly tested in the Vologda region on local federal soil (gravel) highways. Skoda to run in 50 thousand for 2 years of faults was not found, at VW to 15 thousand (the first one) is also rouseed - everything is like a "tank". Both cars are lonely perfectly at high speed even on an uneven road and ughab, as well as on the "washing board". Volkswagen suspension is a bit soon. VW in turns slightly "chatting" on a slippery road - it affects that it is shorter than Skoda by 30 cm.

Prices: Both machines cost almost the same Skoda - 605 thousand rubles., VW - 550 thousand rubles (without magnetol, rugs and mudguards). But the Skoda is in a much richer configuration: heated all and all, parking sensors, electric mirrors and all 4 glass in the cabin, cruise control and a mass of all nice little things, such as a leather wheel. VW for this money almost "empty": from options front electric windows and headlight washer. Prices for maintenance of both cars are the same - 15,000 km (TO1) - 5600 rubles, 30000 km (TO2) - 9600 rubles, 45,000 km (TO3) - about 7,000 rubles, no extra. Work with both machines did not do. If comparing S. Nissan Tiida.Familiar, who, too, drive in Vologda, and which on the 1st then (10,000 km) paid 30,000 rubles, then Skoda and VW everything is very cheap. In Skoda, on the 3rd, the guarantees were replaced by leashes of janitors, they "got" coverage, but this is extremely aesthetic repairs. The VW to the 1st then stopped working the windshield washer engine, the diagnosis of 2000 rubles., Replacing the burnt fuse - 500 rubles. But it is on the conscience of dealers. In general, Folkswagen dealers in St. Petersburg are characterized by rudeness and arrogance. But this is a separate story. Employees of Skoda, on the contrary, preventative and polite. And it can be traced in completely different car dealerships.

Total: If you choose between VW and Skoda, then I, of course choose Skoda. If you choose among VW, Koreans, the Japanese and the French - that is definitely Volkswagen. He is the best. With the "Germans": Audi A1 and A3, the BMW of the 1st VW Series to compare, I consider it senselessly, these cars are much more expensive and more interesting.

Yes, I do not consider the VW Polo sedans, I generally think that the car "Polo" class and sedan things are incompatible and such sedans are created exclusively for people who have not survived socialism. Confirmation by my words is that polo sedans are officially sold only in the territory of the post-Soviet space.

So, Czech subsidiary Concern VW - Skoda launched a new generation of its successful a passenger car Small class. Before you, a completely new Fabia. Last year, Fabia of the previous generation has already lost in the market such brands like Polo, Corsa and Fiesta. And still remained number 4 for sales in Germany. it excellent result, given the solid age of Fabia.

The new Czech Saltra claims leadership in its class. How justified by her claims?

Now everything can change cool. Eastern European machine goes to the market not only with a new design, but also with more modern technical filling. Already in 2007, Fabia received that Polo's brother can be proud of only 2008.

It is very new car Among competitors. The new generation of VW Polo will appear only in a year and technically will in many respects to repeat Fabia

However, Baby Fabia has more enemies-competitors: completely fresh peugeot 207 and Opel Corsa.! Polo, on the one hand, of course, prestigious and made in Germany, in Wolfsburg, but on the other hand, this VW released in 2001 and is noticeably outdated. True, the German audience, he is still incredibly high demand.

Main European competitors updated year-a half ago

Skoda comes to its competitors is opposed to the body-in-size and, accordingly, the salon. Externally, the new Fabia is a mixture from Mini and Suzuki SWIFT. Now she can boast a bright, fashionable and dynamic design.

All four tested machines are equipped with 1.4 L engines with a capacity of 80 to 90 hp.

Yes, the polo is higher, there are more space above the head, but Fabia has more space in the back row, which may be very important for someone! Peugeot, despite the longest database - 2.34 meters - a champion in lack of place in the knees for the rear passengers.

Transportation of goods? For Fabia is a slight exercise. None of these babies can be able to swallow more suitcases. 207 enters less. But on the transformation of the salon Peugeot turns out to be more convenient. Already in basic configuration The car has a rear row of seats. Also able Fabia and Corsa, but only in certain equipment. Polo even in the basic version can get such a rear row, but for surcharge!

Volume luggage compartment Corsa from 285 to 1100 liters. In general, the trunk capabilities clearly improved compared with the previous Corsa: now the horizontal breakdown of the trunk on the department is now available. different size. But the main miracle - the corsa can get a double sex! If you need, for example, to carry two bikes without occupying the space of the trunk, then the next "chip" will help you: from the rear bumper, a small pallet is put forward with fasteners just for two bicycles!

Skoda is still a good, high-quality salon. Finishing materials are worthy of the price that Fabia will have to pay. The driver's seat resembles Astra, but it looks less strict, more neat. And on some versions, more brighter, thanks to the spectacular motley colors prevailing in the decoration. It is especially interesting to see the modular (!) The average console, which can be equipped at the request of various equipment, such as a Bluetooth phone, DVD player and digital radio. For each configuration, the salon can be ordered with different finishes, combinations of paints. However, in the meager basic configuration of Skoda, there is nothing but a single airbag, an audio preparation, immobilizer and an adjustable steering planes with an amplifier. Everything!

Turns he also goes better than all

Ergonomics of the workplace in POLO, as always, on high level: functionality, high quality and simplicity - here are the foundations of the VW philosophy in the design of interiors. True, many "people's" polo will seem inside too boring - especially in comparison with competitors.

Opel and Peugeot look more interesting. However, Corsa has shortcomings - workplace The driver is overloaded, the visibility is clearly not at the height. Salon 207th is very friendly, dear, ergonomically verified. There is only one miscalculation: the air conditioner regulators of the French could arrange and higher.

The interior does not affect the imagination, as in Corsa, but everything is done very carefully

Folding rear sofa is available in any configuration, but for an additional fee, alas.

In terms of comfort, all four are approximately the same. 207 still transmits fewer jogs and shaking into the salon. The Peugeot looks like Opel, in general, he adequately copes with the problems of our roads. Only at all very bad sites in the rose grind the front and rear bridges. At the well-groomed tapes of Asphalt Corsa slides calmly and confidently. Polo and Fabia Street cracks and other "small joys" pass with imperturbability. Nevertheless, VW and Skoda sometimes miss light shocks and about the problems of the roadway, they are reported to their passengers in more detail.

V. W Polo not so long ago Restyling, but age already affects the car

But little Skoda. On its 16-inch wheels at any time sharply attack turns allowing himself only small rolls. Opel and Peugeot Manyat Cancelled side qualities, encourage K. dynamic style driving. Mills the pleasure of both the work of the hydraulic agent. Both react to sharp course corrections are not so directly as POLO and Fabia.

Nevertheless, POLO is still in demand in Germany.

The interior is rather boring and primitive. However, the materials and quality of the assembly at the height

Inside Polo inferior to Fabia both on the rear seat and the volume of the trunk

Solid plus Fabia - the presence of ESP even in the database. Other 3 kids - there is no such thing. Where in Fabia will go calmly and quickly, - electronics will force, - Polo, Corsa and, above all, 207 requires a special approach and high driver's skills.

This is true, in very dangerous turns! But it's not only in the absence of ESP from the rest of the Czech Fabia competitors. These are not all problems. Polo and Corsa disillusion brake path About 41 m: Very weak. 207 Better - 39.6 m, Fabia Record holder among rivals - 38.4 meters.

The new Opel Corsa appeared a year ago and immediately won many fans with their energetic design, especially the three-door version

Test machines motors from 80 to 90 hp, working in a pair with five-speed mechanics. Contrary to the most insignificant power (80 hp) the light weight of the polo (1065 kilograms) allows him to move and achieve hundreds faster than everyone! His applicants for overclocking up to 100 km / h lose approximately one second. Corsa and 207 look the most slow. A somewhat faster Fabia pleased with their sonorous sound and accurate work of the checkpoint. Although 13 seconds spent up to 100 km / h obviously do not make from Skoda champion on the dynamics of overclocking.

Pendant from the resident of Rüsselsheim is not as serious as POLO / Fabia and most suitable for riding on a good road

The palette of engines directly supplied to us Fabia covers 3 gasoline motorvolume from 1.2; 1.4 and 1.6 liters and power spectrum from 69 to 105 hp The gearbox is available either mechanical 5-speed or 6-speed automatic.

Opel driver's seat looks somewhat overloaded. Despite the obvious sports ambitions Corsa, the steering wheel behaves in the central position quite sluggish

Fabia can be purchased in Russia at a price of 12999 to $ 20690 US dollars. In the tested configuration - from 16 thousand dollars.

Thanks to bright inserts, the salon looks very smart

Outcome: New Fabia. Makes a well-reasonable application for leadership in its class. She is spacious, goes well and looks modern. Sure, new design Skoda some will seem controversial, but in any case it is much better than the first generation of hatchback. Now already Polo. It seems hopelessly outdated, close and disproportionately expensive. 207 that appeared on the market a year and a half ago, looks like the most stylish, although inferior to the Germans in dynamics and the square on rear seat. On the other hand, no one and did not position the cars of this class as family vehicles. In addition, it is the only car that has a folding rear sofa in the database. Very worthy looks new Corsa.However, the visibility was sacrificed to the design, and the engine turned out to be the most close-looking moment.

PEUGEOT 207 appeared in early 2006

The cockpit of the 207th is a sample of ergonomics, with the exception of two climate control regulators that could be higher. 207th among the fourth who is standard equipment has a folding rear sofa

Despite the largest wheelbase, on the second row of the 207th, quite closely

On the dynamics of Peugeot loses a bit of Germans, but it is the most economical that for the machine of this class is one of the most important parameters. And for lovers to "catch up" with the breeze there is a version of RC!

Greetings you dear reader!

I do not know what I encouraged me to write the next review, maybe the desire to prove that Fabia is quite a good, small car, and maybe just reading one of the reviews about one of the common cars with a 2-liter car. In any case, perhaps I will start.

In this review, I will not be verminated because it is in general something and nothing to talk about and what is the point of rewriting the former feedback. The thing is that from the moment of writing the previous review, nothing that would have paid attention to ourselves did not happen.

Strengths:

small dimensions

advance reliability

simplicity of design from this repairability

Weak sides:

Fuel consumption 8-9 liters per 100 km. in the town

I would like better noise insulation

Feedback Skoda Fabia 1.2 12V (Skoda Fabia) 2010

Good afternoon, dear colleagues car enthusiasts and motorists!

I give your attention a review about choosing, buying and operating a wonderful car Skoda. Fabia.

So, a little about yourself: 32 years old (in 2009), married, Son 6 years old, I live in Serpukhov, I work in Moscow. The car is needed for trips to work 2 times a week and on business in the city.

Strengths:

• Safety
• Reliability
• Economy
• Inexpensive
• Acceptable clearance
• Controllability
• Gabarits.

Weak sides:

• Noise insulation
• Comfort suspension
• Warranty 2 years
• Flaw in petty

Feedback Skoda Fabia 1.4 16V (Skoda Fabia) 2013

Hi friends! Hello, dear readers!

So, I will begin, it happened in our life a pleasant event - we bought a car! Why we, well, because the car for my wife, but it's nice to both of us, my wife because she is now her own machine, but I don't need to be underwhelmed on trifles and go somewhere, now I can avoid it) )).

Probably already at the current tradition will begin with the flour of choice or why still Skoda Fabia. Do not think that I was the initiator of buying a second car only from the VAG family, I did not consider this concern at all, on my part I was offered Renault Sundero Stepway, it seemed to me that the second car should be a car that is at least a bit higher in the plan road Suitthan our current Octavia. In the summer, we leave to the forest and the clearance plays the value, and Steppe is decently more than many cars, in addition, he also has a decorative body kit, which, as I think, gives a good car appearance. Another of the important factors in favor of Reno was his all-consuming suspension, in the depths of which the realities of our roads and directions were dissolved, I myself rode several times a passenger in Sandero and I really liked how it rides on a comb and small irregularities. Perhaps, only a high consumption of gasoline can be noted from the minuses, but they say that he is in the bottom.

Strengths:

• Controllability
• Economy
• Capacity

Weak sides:

Feedback Skoda Fabia 1.4 16V (Skoda Fabia) 2013 part 2

Hello everyone! Already a year since the purchase of Fabia and it seemed to me that it would not be superfluous to draw a few lines about it.

I will start with the body, even when driving from a car dealership to the house, I noticed that all the dirt smeared with brushes from the windshield flows on the side just at the level of the eye, thereby having a full-fledged review, immediately decided that I would like to buy a visor. In winter, there were no problems with the review and there was nothing to complain about what, with the arrival of summer, I bought and stuck those westings, the benefit undoubtedly there, but only the fact that in the rain you can open a little window and water will not get inside the cabin, On the track, the whole dirt still hits the side glass, but now just above the eye level. Based on this, I can safely say that the engineer who was engaged in the design of Mildly speaking a talentless person, at the same golf + windshield As if drowning in the rack and dirt in theory, it should rise around the edge of the lobovik to the roof, and there let him go anywhere, the main glass of the side is clean, such as I seen on some models of Merce, I have no such thing at octavia, but there are no such claims. In general, here on the body of Fabi minus.

Greetings you dear reader!

I do not know what I encouraged me to write the next review, maybe the desire to prove that Fabia is quite a good, small car, and maybe just reading one of the reviews about one of the common cars with a 2-liter car. In any case, perhaps I will start.

In this review, I will not be verminated because it is in general something and nothing to talk about and what is the point of rewriting the former feedback. The thing is that from the moment of writing the previous review, nothing that would have paid attention to ourselves did not happen.

Strengths:

small dimensions

advance reliability

simplicity of design from this repairability

Weak sides:

Fuel consumption 8-9 liters per 100 km. in the town

I would like better noise insulation

Feedback Skoda Fabia 1.2 12V (Skoda Fabia) 2010

Good afternoon, dear colleagues car enthusiasts and motorists!

I give your attention a review about choosing, buying and operating a wonderful Skoda Fabia car.

So, a little about yourself: 32 years old (in 2009), married, Son 6 years old, I live in Serpukhov, I work in Moscow. The car is needed for trips to work 2 times a week and on business in the city.

Strengths:

• Safety
• Reliability
• Economy
• Inexpensive
• Acceptable clearance
• Controllability
• Gabarits.

Weak sides:

• Noise insulation
• Comfort suspension
• Warranty 2 years
• Flaw in petty

Feedback Skoda Fabia 1.4 16V (Skoda Fabia) 2013

Hi friends! Hello, dear readers!

So, I will begin, it happened in our life a pleasant event - we bought a car! Why we, well, because the car for my wife, but it's nice to both of us, my wife because she is now her own machine, but I don't need to be underwhelmed on trifles and go somewhere, now I can avoid it) )).

Probably already at the current tradition will begin with the flour of choice or why still Skoda Fabia. Do not think that I was the initiator of buying a second car only from the VAG family, I did not consider this concern at all, on my part I was offered Renault Sundero Stepway, it seemed to me that the second car should be a car that is at least a little higher in the road lumen plan than Our current Octavia. In the summer, we travel to the forest and the clearance plays a value, and Steppe is decently more than many cars, in addition, he also has a decorative body kit, which, it seems to me, gives the car a good appearance. Another of the important factors in favor of Reno was his all-consuming suspension, in the depths of which the realities of our roads and directions were dissolved, I myself rode several times a passenger in Sandero and I really liked how it rides on a comb and small irregularities. Perhaps, only a high consumption of gasoline can be noted from the minuses, but they say that he is in the bottom.

Strengths:

• Controllability
• Economy
• Capacity

Weak sides:

Feedback Skoda Fabia 1.4 16V (Skoda Fabia) 2013 part 2

Hello everyone! Already a year since the purchase of Fabia and it seemed to me that it would not be superfluous to draw a few lines about it.

I will start with the body, even when driving from a car dealership to the house, I noticed that all the dirt smeared with brushes from the windshield flows on the side just at the level of the eye, thereby having a full-fledged review, immediately decided that I would like to buy a visor. In winter, there were no problems with the review and there was nothing to complain about what, with the arrival of summer, I bought and stuck those westings, the benefit undoubtedly there, but only the fact that in the rain you can open a little window and water will not get inside the cabin, On the track, the whole dirt still hits the side glass, but now just above the eye level. Based on this, I can safely say that the engineer who was engaged in design to put it mildly a talentless person, at the same golf + windshield, as it were, drowning in the rack and dirt in the idea should rise around the edge of the lobovik on the roof, and there let it go anywhere, the main glass The side clean, similar to Some Merci models, I don't have this at octavia, but there are no complaints. In general, here on the body of Fabi minus.