When I bought a car, I didn't even think about. I sold my own and went to watch. I went to Solon Kiya South Motors in Kemerovo .... And first I did not like the machine. I had a wheezing the Lacety station wagon - and this little like a bug. Then, the manager caught the meticulous, offered to look inside, sit and spent anyone. Well, it was not impressed at first, and already sat down in the brain. I went on the salon-watched and Skoda, and Peugeot, and Citroen, and Juk, but before his eyes stood Soul, and I was looking for analogies. In short, returned and designed. It would be nice if they were given at once, if the machine is available, but still waited for a week of PTS. Prevented the box - the mechanics of the six-speed - this is something. I do not digest the machine guns, but there is the same with a machine gun who does not know how to contact the box. I have experiences from 87 years old, with an automatic I have a hand to do a hand-habit. And the foot pedal is looking for. In short, whom you need.

Now, 1.5 years went by almost 30 thousand. I will say about the operation.

We went to Khakassia, and on the mountain altai and in the summer and winter. The machine is good.

Strengths:

• Salon Spacious, in the city is indispensable
• Comfort at level
• Small consumption of gasoline
• Resistant to the track
• Good soft box
• Good built-in audio system-excellent bulk sound
• Good design
• Not bad assembly

Weak sides:

• Noise isolation - zero. Quality coloring - I would like under varnish

Review Kia Soul 1.6 (Kia Soul) 2012

I decided to make my contribution to writing feedback, especially since they are not so much on this resource)))

Soul became my first new (in the sense of the cabin) machine. Before that it was: Muscovite IZH21251, Daewo Sens, Chevrole Aveo, Forester 2007, Outback 2005. Moskvich is worthy of a separate review, but it's like a thread another time))) Subara (both) were a dream of childhood, but still riding them For some time and appreciating not only the advantages, but also the cost of the service of Buchny Subara, decided to take something easier, but the new and warranty. By the way, Torik with the manual transmission did not break almost at all, but, damn, he jerked me to replace him with an outback with automatic transmission - that's where it all started))).

Now closer to business. Choosing the car, went over the following options: Octavia 1,8stsi DSG, GOLF 1.4 TSI DSG, Lancer 1.6 automatic transmission, Tuxon 2.0, Suzuki SX4, Nissan Note 1.6, C4 citron, pyzh 307. The Kia brand did not consider first in principle. The French auto industry disappeared immediately - everything is beautiful and good, but, Sceuko, does not go and all. As people on our tracks with one strip in each direction they move to them - the mind is incomprehensible, the dynamics of acceleration is absent in principle. Well, after Subarie, there is a very low-fat clearance of them)). Lancer did not cause any emotions, the car is like a car, but those 25 Tuys, which was asked for him, clearly did not cost. Nissan Nout - the appearance is not for me, sitting in it not very comfortable (height 198), and the automatic 4-mortar in our time is no longer Comilfo (although, probably reliable, xs). I have not liked your cotton brakes at the laptop. Tushkan pleased with a low price and some "SUV", but disappeared the terrible quality of the cabin, an ancient blunt voracious machine and the inability to ignite normally at the driver's seat (adjusting the seat up-down at that time was already absent in any grades). In general, I abandoned the ceiling on your head categorically. Suzuku Testrilleven is more of curiosity than serious intentions. The first impressions are a wooden salon, the engine is how much is not going - in general, you need to focus with the file ... Octavia and Golf - I liked almost in all respects, but the price tag was approaching 30 tons in a normal configuration, so I decided to live on the tools )))

KIA SOUL 1.6 GDI AT PRESTIGE

Power - 132 hp
Acceleration 0-100 km / h - 11.7 s
Price - 1 191 900 rub.

Nissan Juke 1.6 CVT Le Perso

Power - 117 hp
Acceleration 0-100 km / h - 11.5 s
Price - 1 288 000 rub.

Power - 110 hp
Acceleration 0-100 km / h - 11.3 s
Price - 1,485,000 rubles.

Suzuki Vitara 1.6 AT 2WD GL +

Power - 117 hp
Acceleration 0-100 km / h - 12.5 s
Price - 1 325 950 rub.

KIA SOUL 1.6 GDI AT PRESTIGE

Nissan Juke 1.6 CVT Le Perso

PEUGEOT 2008 1.2 Puretech AT Allure

Suzuki Vitara 1.6 AT 2WD GL +

Kia Soul, Nissan Juke, Suzuki Vitara, Peugeot 2008

"I wish I would have a puppy to drive it on a leash" ... the old children's song is full of faith - like our four crossovers. Little, pretty, on a comfortable thick "paws" - well, what are not puppies?

Text Kirill Brevdo, photo Alexander Odod

Little crossovers of such a format we have already collected together, but it was quite a long time ago - almost three years ago. Since then, the interest of buyers to such a technique is not fightened at all, but the segment itself has changed slightly: new players have appeared, and some old-timers updated. So we decided to once again collect the team of rivals to find out which of them cooler. Criteria for the choice of purely urban: extremely compact dimensions, front actuator and "automatic". As a result, a whole quartet accumulated under the windows of the editorial office.

Kia Soul. This comrade recently survived the restyling and acquired new power units, including a 132-strong motor of 1.6 liters with direct fuel injection, a 6-speed "automatic" works in a pair. Just such a version we took for our test drive.

Nissan Juke. The car is well known. Some time ago, the crossover left russian marketBut this summer suddenly returned - albeit with a smaller variety of modifications, but with additional equipment and advanced personalization capabilities in the form of all colorful decorations. All machines are sold only with a 1.6-liter engine (117 forces) and variator.

Suzuki Vitara. Now the most popular model of the Japanese company in our comparative races has never participated. This is the only car in our quartet, which can be bought with a full drive. But for comparison, we chose the front-wheel drive version with a basic engine 1.6 (117 hp) and a 6-speed "automatic".

PEUGEOT 2008. Recent restyling made the appearance of the car and brought a new three-cylinder turbo engine 1.2 liters with a 6-speed "automatic" (before was the hopeless 1,6-liter engine and "four proto").

In general, the company gotten decent. Let's see which of them will be able to die more than others.

The first Soul appeared in 2009 and was built on the Hyundai-Kia PB platform - that very much that Kia Venga's asymmetric hatchback was based on Hyundai Veloster.. The appearance of "Sokula" was preceded by a whole set of three concepts - Burner, Diva and Searcher - they decided to infect the public a year before the birth of the serial car.

The current "Dushka" refers to the second generation - his debut took place at the New York Motor Show in March 2013. The car was adjusted a new, more adult platform, overall with Ceed and Cerato. And last year the car survived restyling.

Have you noticed that I try to avoid the term "crossover"? All correctly, because the road clearance is 150 mm and the absence of a full drive does not allow it to be counted it to the face of parquets. Hatchback increased passibility? Already closer. But there is no such class in the automotive nature, besides, Koreans insist in every way that this is the crossover. It is easier to agree to argue.

Before restyling, it was possible to buy a diesel soul, but now this version of the model range mysteriously disappeared. But gasoline power units broke up - Give God! Two 1,6-liter motor with a capacity of 124 or 132 forces (last with direct injection of fuel), a 204-strong turbo engine of the same volume for a GT version and a two-liter unit with a capacity of 150 forces from the older Sportage crossover is available. "Mechanics" only in the basic version, all other modifications are equipped with 6-speed "automata", and Soul GT has a 7-speed "robot" DCT.

Appearance from "Sokula" is spectacular. Korean from those machines that can be loved by their eyes and buy exclusively from aesthetic considerations. Bright colors, two-color coloring - great when such machines appear on the streets. Eye rejoices! And the legs sadness: the thresholds are quickly dumping and willingly divide mud with jeans. And Kia is the only quartet deprived of plastic protection of the wheeled arches.

The loading height of the trunk is Velika - "Peugeot" and "Suzuki" in this sense is humane. But the freight branch itself is too modest, although under the flooring there was a rather roomy subfield divided into sections. And even lower there was a place for a date. The trunk may annex part of the cabin, and this opportunity to the owner of the Korean car will have to use quite often. But no more than the "jukod".

But the rear row is unexpectedly good for such a small car. The central tunnel atrophied, therefore you can even try to sit in the threesome. And two passengers are generally good: and the planting process is not overshadowed, and the place is plenty - both in the legs and head. There is heated seats and a central armrest - in general, a complete set of amenities.

Contrast, extremely concise

devices "Sokula" are very good in terms of the perception of information. The flightcomputer is excellent

6-speed "Automatic"

behaves adequately, but the dynamics still leaves much to be desired due to motor failure

I can not believe

what such a compact car can have such a spacious interior!

The trunk can be extended to the salon,

and this opportunity to the owner of Kia will have to use quite often

Not bad and in a driver's seat. Yes, not just good, but quite well! In the rich configuration, the chair is regulated by the electrician. You can play with an angle of inclination of the pillow - this particularly pleases against the background of competitors. The steering wheel is adjustable in sufficient bands, and in general, ergonomics does not cause questions - all in their places. The lack of visibility through the intra-alone mirror (with autocessing, by the way) "KIA" compensates for large outer mirrors and a good rear-view chamber.

The interior of Soul is hardly the best in the class! At least, his today's rivals are far away - both in style and according to the quality of execution. Materials are excellent, all that is necessary is heated, the steering wheel is convenient - in general, solid lept. In addition to the outlet at 12V, there is a pair of USB connectors - one on the central console, the second in the box-armrest. The backlight in the visors, the branch for points - everything was provided for Koreans. And even about the decorative illumination of the interior, which can change the colors, performing the function of light vehicles, the creators of "coil" have not forgotten. Healthy!

The multimedia system was once modern, but now it is already slightly outdated - first of all because of the graphics. But everything works quite quickly, although the control of the tuner and input to the memory of the radio stations could be more logical. The navigation is generally acceptable, much more that most of the "coils" are sold without it.

The dynamics of acceleration with a 1.6-liter engine does not cause special emotions, although it fully matches expectations. And yet the motor is noisy, especially with active actions. The box works more than adequately - thank you very much.

The first thing that the driver attracts is the ultralight steering wheel. He, of course, is empty, but it does not cause problems. Handling without special delights, but rather vigorous: Turns are not interesting. But - exactly as long as the road is smooth: as soon as they appear on the asphalt, Kia is accepted to jump on them, losing all columns. And discomfort begins to test not only the driver, but also passengers - especially in the back row. In general, from the point of view of the smoothness of the stroke Soul - a clear outsider. But noise insulation in the standard motion modes is more than worthy - at least.

Patency - not about Kia Soul. In principle, this can be fully said about his rivals. The rear swell is small, but the bumper hangs at the front. Yes, and 153 mm of the road lumen is a fiasco, bro!

Debut new compact crossoverBuilt on a common platform with Hatchback Micra and the compacttwon Note, came to the Geneva Motor Show in the spring of 2010. However, a year before that, "Nissanovsky" managed to light up Qazana's concept, on which the Japanese safely rolled out the design future car. And already in 2011, Juke got to Russia - the truth, as usual, not fully: the "Renicious" diesel k9k remained the lot of European buyers. We sold modifications with 1,6-liter gasoline engines, the basic versions without boosting (117 hp) assumed the front actuator in combination with the "mechanics" or "variator". Turbo (190 forces) with front-wheel drive could be taken "on hand", and the all-wheel drive version meant an exceptionally variator.

After restyling, 2014, Dzhuka, in addition to some outdoor changes, there was a new turbo engine 1.2 liter, however, the crossover was not supplied to Russia. And a year and a half ago, the car disappeared from sale at all. And only now Juke returned to our market - with a single motor and variator.

By the way, in China, you can buy a premium version of "Juka", which is called Infiniti ESQ. At the same time, in the most subway model, the model is not produced: crossovers are available only in Japan, Indonesia and the United Kingdom. We sell cars from the English Sunderland.

About the appearance of "Juku" argue from the very moment of the appearance of this crossover. The benefit of arguing is about what: the design is really ambiguous. But it is quite definitely possible to say that it is better to stand out against the background of other machines than to merge with the total mass. So I welcome the "Jucin" nonconformism! And with bright colored accents that accompany some sets, Juke looks extremely bold. No matter how regrettable, the appearance of "Nissan" was not the best way to reflected on its consumer qualities: attempts to instill a "jewelry" appearance turned out to be bought by the rear doors and a tiny trunk.

The cargo compartment from "Juka" is not only modest, but not too comfortable. As in Kia, there is a double floor here, but the distance under the upper flooring is small, there is little fit. And at the bottom there is a dance. The back of the sofa is in favor of the trunk in parts, allowing you to transport more or less large items.

But large passengers in the back row are extremely undesirable. Juke is not too hospitalized at all: and break on the sofa, wiping the wheeled arches, not easy, and is uncomfortable there. Light through small windows passes a little, the ceiling is low, the front armchairs is close. And no additional amenities are provided - some inconveniences.

Rather behind the wheel! There is already a completely different mood. Inspired! Emotions Specifies Design: Painted in bright yellow color Central tunnel builds a pot from a motorcycle. Yellow lines on the upholstery of the chairs, yellow inserts on door panels, yellow decor on ventilation air ducts - beauty, in general. But in ergonomics there are gaps. So, for example, surprises the lack of adjustment of the steering column on departure - the steering wheel swings up and down, not more. The pilot of the driver's chair seemed short. No steering wheel, and the automatic mode is only at the driver's windows. For some reason, the Japanese did not provide highlighting make-up mirrors in the sun visors.

The informativeness of the main devices are good

but the route computer inscribed between the dials is archaic

The variator works smartly

but with intensive acceleration fixes the motor at high speed, broadcasting monotonous hums into the salon

No extra amenities in the back row

"Jukka" is not provided - some continuous inconveniences

From the point of view of JUKE visibility, it is clearly not a champion. In the basic versions there is no rear view camera, but in the top - immediately a circular review, pretty stupid, however: the picture quality leaves much better. The view of the salon mirror is limited by a small end of the trunk door, and the outer mirrors are small, but inconvenience do not cause. But the monitoring system of dead zones is clearly unlisted. Inside there is not enough rear parking sensors, but it does not have it in any of the packages.

The interior is pretty, although in terms of the quality of Materials "Juk" left the "Suzuki". The devices are good, but the scroll screen is too prosepotky. In our version, the steering wheel was a pleasant perforated leather, and the leather furniture looks neat. But in the heat I would prefer to sit on the "rag". Climate control unit is doubled: by pressing the D-MODE button, you can turn it into the control panel of the machine settings, with various bonuses like the longitudinal and transverse acceleration recorder. In this case, the inscriptions on the buttons are funny. That's just to attach a smartphone nowhere.

The touchscreen display of the multimedia system is poor graphics, although quite functional - even with navigation. It is easy to understand the menu, and it is quite convenient to use the interface. The main thing is the volume control knob, and it is more convenient than the buttons on the steering wheel, which can also be controlled by music.

"Jook" demonstrates a convincing overclocking dynamics. The variator works smartly, however, with intensive acceleration fixes the motor at high speed, translating a monotonous hum of the power unit into the salon. But in spite of everything to go to "Nissan" somehow joyful: he fun running forward, submissively following the gas pedal. Yes, and the crossover rulits itself very much: it is immediately felt that the engineers worked over manageability as it should. On the steering wheel, the car reacts vividly, in turnings it is tight - in general, it is easily carried out.

By smoothness, the JUKE move is far from the standard - however, it is not an outsider. Yes, the suspension is quite detailed - but not annoying hard. By irregularities, the crossover runs easily, demonstrating excellent energy intensity. As for noise insulation, there is nothing to say about it: normal, no more than that. Solts the engine, it is undoubtedly. Otherwise, there is no reason for the praise, nor for criticism.

Exam for Patency - not for "Jukka". Four-wheel drive is possible, but not available in Russia. Without it, it is necessary to calculate only on geometry. But she, by the way, is breeding: short sinks and decent road clearance 180 mm will allow a small typewriter to drive there, where "Kia" and "Peugeot" are stuck. The main thing is not to pour the variator.

The predecessor in 2008 was not, although it is believed that this car can be viewed as a replacement for the compact Wagon PEUGEOT 207 SW, which, by the way, was an off-road version of Outdoor (not sold in Russia). Actually, from the "Wagon" 2008 left: and his clearance is small, and there is no full drive. From the Crossover from the "Frenchman" only design. However, there are almost all urban "parcktails" - as you can see, competitors are no better.

Peugeot 2008, built on the Hatchback Platform 208, was the world in the spring of 2013 in Geneva, and in a year the car reached Russian dealers. The French prepared for the machine four power units, the basic prescribed a 3-cylinder gasoline engine 1.2 liters with a capacity of 82 hp. Next step - 115-strong 1.6 liter engine. Plus a pair of 1.6 l diesel engines (92 or 115 forces). Subsequently, a gasoline 165-strong turbo engine 1.6 THP was added, which was installed on the Sport version.

Only the first two modifications were supplied to our edges: 1.2 with "mechanics" and 1.6 with "automatic". However, after a recent restyling of 2008, the range of power aggregates was revised, so now in Russia only one version is sold with a new turbo engine of 1.2 liters with a capacity of 110 forces in a pair with a 6-speed automatic activation (used only 4 steps). You do not have to dream about the full drive.

Is the Peugeot 2008? Perhaps yes. The appearance of him is quite placing, but rather neutral. Therefore, in terms of visual emotions, rather closer to Suzuki, rather than Kia with "Nissan". However, all this taste. And here is an objective reality: practical plastic around the perimeter, including on the lower edges of the doors. It is a pity that the latners are not able to protect the thresholds from dirt. Apparently, it is not in France (although I know for sure that it is not so).

It must be said that "pyness" seems the most passenger, although the road clearance has even wisely than "Sokula". Similar to that small wheels are completely increasing dimension.

And according to other parameters 2008 closer to cars. Here, let's say, the loading height of the trunk is minimal: only 620 mm. Like a hatchback! In terms of size and convenience, the "Peugeot" is a clear leader. The geometry is correct, on the left is a wide gum, which you can reappoint a canister with a wash, the mesh for small items is stretched on the left. The sofa is folded correctly by forming a smooth loading area. In general, Telum - what you need!

And the rear row is excellent. But also passenger: landing is very low. Because of this, the knees are located higher than in other machines. But the ceiling at a respectful distance from the head. The sofa is flat almost entirely, so three passengers will sit fine - however, the one who will be in the center will have to be embraced by the tunnel legs. But its presence of strange - all-wheel drive versions in 2008 is not provided.

Ergonomics Peugeot is peculiar, but good. The steering wheel is very small, and the devices are highlighted - you look at them on top of the "Baranki". This is unusual, although quite convenient. The chair is perfectly integrated with sufficient side support. Adjustments are a bit, but they are enough to quickly take the optimal pose. And the most noticeable of the oddities is the handbrake. Rather, his lever, although the lever is difficult to call this thing. Another oddity is a heating wheel, which is located at the base of the chair. The inclusive indication of the inclusion of heating is not: it is necessary either to look down or wait for the effect. Study realization of the useful thing. Does not comfort even understanding the fact that it is a typical French story.

Radial digitization of devices -

not the best decision In terms of reading information. In addition, the speedometer scale is sliced \u200b\u200bfinely

"AUTOMA" AISIN Japanese company is not bad,

however, in traffic jams, it seems unnecessarily twig. To this, however, it is easy to adapt

Presence of central tunnel

the French car is surprising - all-wheel drive versions of 2008

Simultaneously with folding backs

sofa pillows are served a bit. It turns out a smooth loading area

There are no special complaints about the visibility, although the outer mirrors are small. But the internal has a function of auto-impact, and very decent in terms of pictures of the rear-like camera drags along with no useless rear parking sensors. Facilitates orientation in space and a large area of \u200b\u200bglazing.

The interior pleases the finishing materials. The view is beautiful, to the touch - gently. No worse than in Kia, by and large. All power windows have automatic mode. At night, it lacks the backlight of the keys on the steering wheel, which is slightly straining exactly until all the algorithms for interaction with the control bodies do not fall into the herbs. And there is no highlighting of the make-up mirror. For the French car - shame!

The multimedia system even in the absence of navigation made a pleasant impression by speed and transparency of the interface. Russification seemed to be sane, and the ability to adjust the volume with a separate handle cannot but rejoice. True, with the brightness of the display, the French were overwhelmed: in the dark, it was necessary to unscrew it at a minimum.

Total 110 forces? Three cylinders? I do not believe! Turbo magical power has endowed a 1,2-liter micromotor excellent overclocking dynamics. The set of speeds on the "Peugeot" is invariably cheerful, while the muffled sound of the engine almost does not produce its three-cylinder essence. In addition, she tries to please the driver of Aisin Aisin, who is famously moving all its six transmissions. Glitter!

Controllability? Also good: The steering wheel is transparent, the reactions are fast, minor rolls. "Wild" all maneuvers makes easily and ease. Selflessly. And this joy through a small steering wheel Large doses are transmitted to the driver.

The most amazing thing is that the smoothness turned out to be a reference! It seems that while I changed Kia on Peugeot, in Moscow once repaired all the roads. In the French crossover, I specifically dubbed in irregularities to dispel my doubts and finally make sure that the suspension is ready to dissolve most of the defects of asphalt. This is incredible! How did the creators of 2008 succeed? Riddle!

Against the background of flawless suspension, noise insulation does not seem to be failed. And here everything is fine: the turbo engine works quietly, as if somewhere in the distance, and from the road the car does not raise unnecessary sounds. "Peugeot", I love you!

Patency? Do you really find it? Well, then I will answer: 2008 - in essence, a car. The clearance is small, and in general, the geometry of the body does not contribute to to leave the asphalt. There is a wheel with different modes of operation of electronics on different road surfaces, but it will not pull the peugeot from the mud if you are simplicity of soulful dare to enjoy it. So I strongly recommend enjoying the French car on good roads.

When talking about "Vitar", the question always arises: what generation is this car? Is it worth these two generations of a larger model Grand Vitara.which came to replace the first soda southener of the SUZUKI VITARA of the 1988 sample? If so, then you will have to consider, and then the current crossover with the factory designation LY is over the fourth "knee". Although a full-fledged replacement of the "Grand" car, his debuting in Paris in the fall of 2014, did not: if earlier the car was a full-fledged oscilode with a lower transmission and honest full-wheel drive, now we are in front of us, in fact, a parckarter built on the same platform as SX4. And the basic versions and the front-wheel drive.

In Russia, only gasoline modifications are sold - both with an ancient undead "four" M16a with a capacity of 117 forces and with a new turbo 1.4 boosterjet (140 forces). The latter is only with a 6-speed "automatic", while the 1,6-liter "Vitara" can be both with the ACP and on the "mechanics". But you can always choose between the front and complete drive.

In Europe, of course, a crossover is offered and with a diesel engine. There are no own diesel engines at Suzuki, so the motors 1.6 DDIS with a capacity of 120 forces Japanese supplies Fiat.
We chose the front-wheel drive modification 1.6 AT for cleanliness.

Looks like "Suzuki" almost modestly, but recognizable - designers awarded a crossover with a pleasant appearance. "Vitara" wants to be fashionable, with a pretty taste of exposing its optional two-color. Light angularity goes to this car, and in any case, the "Japanese" does not look boring. Protective black plastic ishing the machine from all sides and almost completely covers the rear bumper from below. Here are just the thresholds, like rivals, are not closed with doors and therefore there will be pants. It is curious that the "suzu" hood is held by gas springs, however, "stick-supporting" is not abolished. It is not clear why it is needed with such a situation.

In the trunk of "Vitara", imagine, also double bottom. What kind of trend is this? The upper floor can be placed slightly higher, comparable to a folded sofa back. And you can put below - then the cargo compartment will become deeper. On the sides of the niche in which can be placed with washes; There are also hooks - coarse, but what they got. Plus, the socket is 12 V. and still a rack of the trunk does not indulge - the "Peugeot" is more sensible.

Maybe the rear row will please the scope? Alas. Door openings are not too broad, so when landing contact with a wheeled arch cannot be avoided. And there is no special stock on the legs, and on the head. And in the direction of the sofa, the central tunnel with an add-in between the front chairs is pretty, so the third passenger will be doomed to embrace his legs. There are no special bonuses for the inhabitants of the second row - not heating, nor the armrest. This is not you Soul since 2008!

But on the driver's seat, there is no bad way. Ergonomics are devoid of serious flaws: the desired settings are easily selected, sit comfortably, the steering wheel lies well in his hands. True, the skin that "Baranka" is trimmed is a bit rough, but for Suzuki, it's in order of things - as well as devoid of finishes a small glove box and a box-armrest between the seats. A Governance on-board computer - In general, hello from the past: the readings on the display are changing using a pin on the dashboard. Anachronism!

With the visibility of things, it is normal, although there are no any auxiliary systems to facilitate maneuvering from "Suzuki". Parktronic is put only by the most expensive set of GLX, although the rear-type camera appears in a slightly more democratic version of GL +. The outer mirrors are small, but the picture is quite detailed.

Suzuki devices are unpleasant,

but informative. However, the flightcomputer readings must be shifted pin, and it is inconvenient

Six steps of an automatic box

"Vitara" replace each other quickly and on time. In the sluggish dynamics only motor

Some special bonuses

for the inhabitants of the second row there is no heating, nor the armrest. This is not a Kia Soul!

Litter trunk does not indulge -

thym in the "Peugeot" is more sensible. But you can always attach a bank with a wash

Interior, honestly, the photo looks better than in reality. On some machines, a large insertion on the front panel can be painted in the body color, but on our car it turned out to be just dark. Round clock, swinging between ventilation air ducts, slightly diversify the picture of the world. It is also trying to make glossy black plastic, but it turns out not very: the dust accumulates on it and fingerprints remain. And still disappointing the quality of the materials of the finish: everything is worked out of the rigid plastics, as on the "Suzuki" of twenty years ago.

The multimedia system saves a little picture - at least visually. Bribes divided into four sectors of the touchscreen, and the circle in the center makes it possible to assign selected commands. Graphics are not the most designer, but it will come down. By and large, the head drawback of the header "Vitara" is the absence of the volume control handle: you have to use either buttons on the steering wheel, or the touch slider to the right of the screen.

Prehistoric 1,6-liter M16A per feats are not capable of: the overclocking dynamics is extremely sluggish. Sports mode slightly improves mood, forcing force aggregate To high speed, but constantly driving "with a motor in the ears" is determined. And on Nizakh "Suzu" does not want to go. The six-speed "automatic" works well and would be happy to add a crossover acumen, just to take it is nowhere. Yes, with a 1.4-liter boosterjet under the hood, the car is transformed, but such turbo negatively affects the car price.

Wow, here is there any power steering? The steering wheel is heavy! But - not a tight. Real old school! It looks promising. And how in practice? So-so. Handling does not excite too much, to be honest. The sensitivity of the steering is low, the informativeness of the drive is mediocre. Somehow ruling - and thank God. In terms of the driving qualities of "Vitara", more than other cars are like a sough. I am sure someone will surely consider such a nature of the car for a spicy feature.

The smoothness of the course is not the strongest side of the car. But, in sensations, the irregularities of different caliber Vitara is still better than Juke, not to mention Soul. And yet it is far to "dust". However, in terms of noise insulation, "Japanese" is clearly not a role sample: acoustic comfort in the cabin is quite mediocre. Solns the engine, he from time to time, the pebbles are rejected, ground along the wheeled arches. Loudly!

Maybe the passability of Suzuki is better than that of competitors? With a full drive - for sure. But we compared the front-wheelwater modifications, so there was no key advantage of the Japanese over rivals. Although the road clearance at the "Vitara" is the most significant (185 mm), the entire picture spoils the impressive front Sve, and the back - a low silencer.

And before the update was good, and after the modernization it became even better. True, slightly: Restyling has not brought special changes. "Dushka" can attract a cool design, a pleasant lounge with a decent finish and relative space in the second row, which is due high roof and vertical landing. The trunk is modest, and the clearance is almost no, but for the city and this is enough. Yes, and reasonable price: SOUL with a "automatic" can be cheaper than a million. Sorry, the suspension is harsh.

- The thing on the amateur. And before such lovers were noticeably more when the car cost much cheaper. Now 1.1 million per little urban crossover, who does not even have Parktronic - this is a bust. In the asset "Nissan" there are interesting handling and not bad riding comfort, and the main disadvantage should be called closeness: there is no place on the sofa or in the trunk. But the nontrivial appearance is - one and plus, and minus "Juku": someone is delighted with her, and someone is in horror.

After restyling turned out to be a candy! Special joy is a matter-of-confering turbo engine, which gives a small "French" with excellent overclocking dynamics. Although against the background of the rivals 2008 is not so small: and sit in the back row, and in the trunk of the place is plenty. And the smoothness of the stroke is completely above all silence! But, no matter how regrettable, the "Pyzi" requests more others for its services: for one and a half million, you can find a bigger car - and with a complete drive, besides.

Against the background of the opponents, it seems the most, how to soften it, how old. The appearance is pleasant, even stylish, but the interior has rumped up: the quality of the materials no longer complies with modern standards. The rear row is not the most convenient, and the trunk is not different with a special capacity. With an ancient engine and a good "automatic", the crossover is more noise than it goes, and the smooth course could be better. One joy: "Suzuki" can be bought with a full drive - unlike competitors.

Prices for Soul start from 891,900 rubles. - For this money you get a car with a motor of 1.6 liters (124 hp) and a mechanical "six-speed" in basic configuration Classic. Makes sense to pay extra not only for more rich version Comfort (75 thousand), but also for "automatic" (50 thousand) - Such Soul will cost 1,016,900 rubles. More powerful motors go only with automatic boxes and with an improved set of equipment: 1.6 liters (132 hp) - from 1 081 900; 2.0 l (150 hp) - from 1 101 900 rubles. Top version of GT (1.6 liters of Turb., 204 forces) pulls 1 391 900 rubles. The Warranty at Kia Soul is 5 years or 150 thousand km, interservice mileage - 15,000 km.

Buy "Dzhuka" is cheaper than a million you will not succeed: basic set SE only starts from 1 107 000 rub. By and large, all the necessary such crossover has already received. There is a reason to pay extra 41 thousand for multimedia with navigation and rear view camera, since the Parktronic for "Nissan" is not proposed in principle. The technique of the same diversity is not: 1,6-liter motor with a capacity of 117 forces together with the variator and drive to the front wheels - that's the whole tale. Nissan warranty - three years or 100 thousand kilometers of run, the frequency of maintenance is 15,000 km.

1,2-liter "Broadcasting" Puretech about 110 forces Plus 6-speed "AUTOMATIC" - other formations on the technique of Peugeot 2008 does not imply. But the package can be chosen: Active for 1 369,000 rubles. or Allure for 1,429,000 rubles. For a surcharge, you can recruit different options like a leather interior (60,000) or multimedia with navigation (25 000). As well as competitors, the "French" will require an extra charge for color: 12 thousand for the usual metallic or 16 thousand per mother-in-pearl - white or red (as in our pictures). Warranty on Peugeot 2008 - two years without a mileage limit. The neoservice interval is small - only 10,000 km.

Prices for Vitaru start with 1,055,000 rubles. for the front-wheel drive crossover with a motor of 1.6 liters (117 forces) and mechanical box Glons in the GL configuration. "Avtomat" expensive - one hundred thousand. The most affordable modification with full-wheel drive will cost at least 1,335,000 rubles, and if you also add an ACP, then the price will grow to 1,395,000 rubles. Vitara S with a turbo engine 1.4 (140 forces) and a non-alternative "automatic" is sold in a single configuration, but allows you to choose the drive: front (1,485,000 rubles) or full - with it 100 thousand more expensive. Suzuki Cars Warranty - 3 years or 100,000 km run, and an intervision interval is 15,000 km.

By comparing different cars among themselves, many buyers make it easier to determine the final choice. And the analysis must necessarily be as objective and unbiased as possible.

Even in the framework of one autocontraser, you can find several decent crossovers at once, between which there is an internal struggle. Motorists do not know who to give preference and what characteristics or criteria do the emphasis.

Because of this, the comparison often falls from cars, which, in principle, relate to different categories in one way or another. In the case of Nissan Qashqai and Terrano, we are talking about compact SUV with several different pricing policies. One pronounced budget, and the second is rather considered. But still the model can also be compared, considering the key and most significant characteristics.

General

The QASHQAI of the Japanese company Nissan refers to the category of compact SUV, which is equipped with an front and complete drive. In this comparison, the second generation has been involved, which appeared in 2014, and in 2018, passed through the planned restyling.

QASHQAI is the first brand car, for which the new CMF modular platform was used. It now creates a new generation of X-Trail.

Nissan Terrano is the actually led version of its assembled from Renault in the face of the Duster model. The platform is used as Duster. This is the third generation of Terrano, which is representatives of the budget compact SUV segment. For the first time appeared in 2013 at the International Exhibition in Mumbai. Although Terrano initially planned to produce purely for the Indian market, sales in Russia started in 2014. In 2016, the car survived the planned restyling and remains unchanged so far. Moreover, within the framework of modernization, the appearance was left untouched by improving the motors by adding new modifications and raising the cost.

Exterior

In order to compare Nissan Terrano and Nissan Qashqai, it is worth starting with external view Two crossovers.

The lack of updates of the appearance from the beginning of the existence of 3 generations Terrano still affect. The exterior of this budget SUV is difficult to call modern. The car looks quite simple, deprived of all sorts of sophisticated firewalls. Frankly looks good, the front part looks, and the relationship with the side and rear thing is clearly traced Renault Duster..

The TERRANO image is off-road, uncharacteristic for modern urban crossovers. This is good, and bad, because some consider a similar appearance to a successful one, the others are compared to some discrepancy between the exterior and real off-road opportunities. If the back and side of Terrano look like DUSTER, then the front part is largely reminiscent of Nissan Pathfinder. And this is an obvious dignity. Also, it is also worth attributed to the SCOS and solid protection on the front bumper, with which the car receives improved possibilities in terms of passability.

The second generation of Qashqai Nissana, and even after planned restyling, allows you to position the model as a full urban modern crossover. The appearance is stylish, dynamic and european. Beautiful lines, exquisite optics, the original front in combination with massive arches and the muscular body make the second Qashqai extremely attractive option.

Qashqai provides solutions that meet the new corporate style of Nissan. There is a possibility that after Updating Terrano will get something similar. But so far nothing is officially reported about it.

As a result, according to the outer data, Qashqai is perceived as a true urban resident, and Terrano recalls the SUV, but only in reduced sizes. Everyone himself decides that he is closer. But the objectively exterior of Qashqai was much more attractive than already outdated terrano.

The dimensions of Qashqai offers the following numbers:

• 4377 mm. in length;
• 1806 mm. in width;
• 1590 mm. height;
• 200 mm. clearance;
• 2646 mm. wheel base.

Terrano received in many ways similar dimensions. In numbers it looks like this:

• length 4342 mm.;
• height 1668 mm.;
• width 1822 mm.;
• 210 mm.;
• wheel base 2674 mm.

It is important not just to have equal dimensions. Where much importance is how well the engineers can take advantage of these dimensions. First of all, they are reflected in the space inside the cabin, as well as on the volume of the luggage compartment.

Interior and trunk

If you have to sit behind the Renault Duster wheel, then when landing in Nissan Terrano, you do not feel anything new for yourself. It was too similar to solutions inside the crossover.

The most attractive salon is the one who has been updated in 2017. The most profitable interior in Terrano looks only in the top configuration, where there is a touch multimedia display, cute washers that are responsible for controlling the climate, as well as a different kind of insertion and metal decor. In the basic version, everything is overly bored and gray. Ergonomics are not exemplary, obvious disadvantages have, as well as their advantages. Looking inside Terrano, you know perfectly well that in front of you the budget crossover. And to this should be ready.

The question of the comfort of the driver and passengers was clearly not paid enough attention, or simply did not want to invest a lot of money. As a result, the space is much from behind and ahead, the lack of space in the legs or in the ceiling is not. But the front seats are deprived of a tangible side support, pillows flat and hard. Behind the same problem.

Qashqai observes the perfect balance between the quality of the materials used and ergonomics. All in its places, finishing at the level, decorative inserts are quite appropriate. The QASGQAI interior can be described as modern and neat, purely European, corresponding to topical trends.

There are very comfortable seats with pronounced lateral support and wide adjustable opportunities. But the rear passengers cannot count on the same level of comfort. Sofa flat, rigid pillow. Calculation of 3 seats.

Landing from behind spacious in Terrano. With about the same in the level of comfort, sofas, a slight advantage of the comfort of the rear passengers budget Crossovers from Nissan. But if we talk about a general impression, then the indisputable favorite will be QASHQAI.

Regardless of the type of actuator, Qashqai offers 430 liters of the free trunk space in a marking position. Folding the rear row, a smooth floor is formed, and the volume increases to 1585 liters.

The size of the trunk of Terrano affects the use of a complete or front drive. In the first case, the compartment has only 408 liters, but in the second increases to 475 liters, exceeding Qashqai. Matching rear seatsA fairly smooth area is formed with a volume of 1570 and 1646 liters for a complete and front actuator, respectively.

In both cases, there is a niche in the subfield, where the full-size spare wheel is located.

With a small translate and under the condition of the front drive, the TERRANO wins in terms of the volume of the trunk. But the all-wheel drive modification is inferior to a more compact Qashqai.

Motors, gearboxes and their capabilities

It is also worth looking for the difference between Nissan Qashqai and budget Nissan Terrano in terms of their technical characteristics, efficiency and dynamics.

To understand what the different crossover differs from the other, it is enough just to look at the proposed motors, boxes, as well as indicators of the dynamics and efficiency of available internal combustion.

To the enormous regret of many Russians, after restyling for Russia, the capacity of 130 horsepower was not available with a fuel consumption of less than 5 liters of diesel fuel per 100 km. Only gasoline engines remained, which slightly equalized the chances of two compared crossovers from one manufacturer.

Therefore, the comparison will be made purely by those motor, which are available for Nissan Terrano and the CASHQI conditional opponent in the Russian market.

Qashqai in Russia is sold with 2 engines.

1. Basic engine goals 1,2-liter turborate with 115 horses. Comes with a manual transmission or stepless variator. From scratch until hundreds accelerates for 10.9 and 12.9 seconds. respectively. The maximum speed on the mechanics is 185, and on the variator only 173 kilometers per hour. Consumes an average of 5.6 to 6.2 liters of fuel per 100 km.
2. Top is atmospheric 2.0 liters generating 144 hp Combined with mechanics and variator. But four-wheel drive Available only with CVT box. On the mechanics, overclocking from place to hundreds takes 9.9 seconds, and the variator produces from 10.1 to 10.5 seconds, depending on the drive. Fuel consumption on average is 7.7 liters for mechanics and 6.9-7.3 liters for the variator.

In terms of technical characteristics, Terrano is unlikely to surprise the owners of Duster or those who have studied information about this car. Conducted by the fact that for terrano available 2 gasoline motorwhich are also installed on DUSTER. The diesel version for Terrano is not provided hereault. It's a pity.

1. The standard or basic engine is considered to be 1.6-liters Motor for 114 horses. The front-wheel drive version is equipped with 5 transmissions, and a four-wheel drive comes with 6 MCPs. Acceleration from space up to 100 km / h ranks from 10.9 to 12.5 seconds. Maximum speed Just 167 kilometers per hour. In a mixed cycle, consumption varies from 7.4 to 7.6 liters per 100 km.
2. The older engine performs 4-cylinder 2-cylinder 2.0 liters with a return of 143 horses. Such an engine comes with a 4-speed automatic transmission or a six-speed automatic machine, and exclusively with a full drive. Overclocking leaves from 10.7 to 11.5 seconds, and the maximum speed does not exceed 180 kilometers per hour. On average, the motor will consume 7.8-8.7 liters of gasoline for every 100 km. Ways.

With relative power equality, the engines for Nissan Qashqai are more modern and cost-effective, providing better dynamics.

Motors for Terrano can not be called bad. But they have a badly accelerate the car, do not demonstrate exemplary efficiency, have a low maximum speed.

But the problem of Qashqai is that the four-wheel drive is for some reason only with the carton variator. In this case, Terrano can be taken on a full drive with a machine gun and a manual box, which is much more preferable in terms of operation of the machine in conditions of bad roads and off-road.

Handling and passability

This is a rather interesting and ambiguous question. If you are looking for a part-time small car, which will be able to drive through difficult areas and overcome a relatively complex off-road, then Nissan Terrano will be the most preferred selection.

The Terrano model has a powerful and strong suspension, thought out front bumper, engine protection, minimum number of protruding elements that allow you to squeeze a maximum of 205 mm of the road lumen. But here manageability from Terrano is worse, the car is not so well the driver listens. The budget crossover is accurately won on off-road.

But if you take urban conditions as a basis, even with not the highest quality road surface, leadership goes to Qashqai. More comfortable, but not excessively soft, suspension, obedient and accurate steering work. Although Qashqai is inferior to Terrano only 5 mm. by road clearance, Qashqai has a poorly adapted off-road body. The rear of it and then clings for irregularities.

Make a choice in favor of one of the candidates is difficult, since everyone has different goals. If you buy a crossover for the city, planning periodically leaving the car somewhere on nature, which does not require wading through the dirt and swamp, then boldly buy Nissan Qashqai. For those who need a passing, a workhorse, a car for fishing and hunting, then take terrano exactly.

Configuration and cost

It is no secret that when choosing a car, many are guided by the issue of affordable budget and the ability to get a maximum of less money.

It was originally said that Terrano belongs to the budget category SUV, while Qashqai is rather a medium-jigneum.

In 2019, Nissan Qashqai is offered in Russia at once in 10 configurations. For the simplest version, they are asking for a minimum of 1.3 million rubles. For this money, you can get a 1,2-liter basic motor with a 6-speed mechanic. The minimum of 1.45 million will cost Qashqai with a 2.0-liter engine on the manual transmission, and for the four-wheel drive will have to give at least 1.6 million.

At the same time, the equipment will consist of:

• GLONASS;
• 6 airbags;
• heating windshield;
• heating front armchairs;
• electrical windows on 4 doors;
• air conditioner;
• cruise control;
• leather steering finishes, etc.

Top equipment is generally fantastic, but worth a minimum of 1.9 million rubles. With full-wheel drive qashqai is available for 2 million and higher.

TERRANO has such a level of configuration. But the prices here are others. TERRANO starts with a price tag from 980 thousand rubles, although in 2017 it cost from 850 thousand.

Basic equipment consists of:

• 2 airbags;
• steering amplifier;
• air conditioner;
• ABS (against ABS, ESP and EBD in the couch base);
• front electric windows;
• audio systems for 4 dynamics;
• steel disks;
• roof rails, etc.

For the four-wheel drive, you will have to give 1.1 million rubles at best, and the version with the automatic box costs another 80-100 thousand more expensive.

Only in the top car Nissan. Terrano can be seen:

• leather interior;
• ABS and ESP;
• 4 airbags;
• heated for the front armchairs;
• multimedia complex;
• rear parking sensors;
• alloy wheels, etc.

For a similar car will have to lay out from 1.3 million rubles.

Where roughly ends the maximum set of Nissana Terrano, just begin to start the price tags on Nissan Qashqai. But at the same time, you can clearly see what a rich set of equipment receives the Qashqai owner even in the basic configuration. One can only imagine that it will include a car worth about 2 million rubles.

Objectively QASHQAI is more modern and has appropriate filling. Terrano, as for the 2013 car, it looks good, and equipped with decent. But in 2019, completely different requirements are presented.

Summing up

Objectively answer the question of what is better - Nissan Terrano or Nissan Qashqai is really difficult. Machines from different price category, focused on several different categories of buyers and their goals.

If the budget is limited at a mark, it will still be difficult to determine, take terrano at maxima, or prefer more modern and stylish Qashqai, albeit in the basic configuration. A set of equipment was too rich.

Abstraught by goals and budget, it is still possible to draw conclusions. Qashqai Best his opponent in many indicators, starting from the appearance, ending with a more advanced platform, high levels safety, technical characteristics and efficiency. Terrano should perceive as an inexpensive workhorse. Although the rise in prices led to the fact that now take Terrano in less than 1 million rubles is unlikely to succeed. And for the money you can buy DUSTER in excellent configuration, albeit with a more modest appearance. But the characteristics will remain the same, and the equipment is richer.

For urban exploitation, a modern motorist will be unconditionally the best choice will be Qashqai. For people who take a car to a fishing trip or hunting, terrano looks preferably for dachens and gardeners. The car is cheaper in price and more affordable in terms of service. Qashqai will have to spend more money.

"Chairs" on autoforums concerned these machines, that in the Japanese Nissan, that the Korean Haydai can be found in the reviews and estimates on the Internet a great many typical prejudice for our brother: both on terrano and on the curb, they say that there is no companion.

Although there are argued and quite reasonable opinions that Nissan Terrano is the same. Therefore, this crossover is ideal for "muddy" and roads of off-road, but Hyundai Cretage is a dull PARTNER, in it during a trip to the mother-in-law on the village, hardly, cuff trousers, and even pants to the very knees will remain clean.

As for the parameters of these machines, they are almost identical:

Relatively differences, then in addition to the differences in design and interior equipment Salons whose overview will be a little later, the transmission of Nissan terano is equipped depending on the configuration of five- and six-speed mechanics, as well as a four-speed automatic transmission. And Hyundai Cretage has either, or.

Comparison of baggage

The terrano large capacity of the tank 55 liters is unlike the Krett, where it is 50 liters, because of which the Japanese has a stroke of 786, while the carriage with full tank "Osilit" is only 676 km. True, both "honey" affects the mileage. If, for the first crossover, this indicator is 7, then the second "shots" of 7.4 liters in the process of a mixed city-ride route.

Yes, and the volume of the trunk is in favor of terrano, which is 475 in this crossover, when the Krett is 402 liters. So, on terrano on seven buckets of potatoes, you can bring more from the mother-in-law than, if you do it on the kret.

Despite the fact that these cars are in the same market in the market and would seem to compare their technical and functional characteristics Pretty simple procedure. But actually it is not. And the question whose model will take the top, will most likely be rhetorical.

Each model has both its preferential advantages and various claims from users.

Read also

Comparison of Renault Captures and Hyundai Cret
This article will describe the car comparison Renault Kaptur. and Hyundai Creta.. The cost of such machines is approximately a million rubles, they are equipped with 1.6 liter engines and mechanical gearbox. As for others ...

According to the salons - a comparison, judging by the reviews, in favor of terrano. It is noted that the salon of this car is even better decorated not only than the Krett, but even with her twin on the external design of Renault Duster.

Although according to the general auto antetheetting, which is considered by one of the agencies, according to the reviews of the owners of the same brand, the coat has a rating indicator 8.1, while terrano is 7.9 of the maximum possible 10 points. Moreover, the difference in two tenth points is considered a rather significant gap. For example, only a few stamps of cars have an estimate of 9 points, and 8.5 is an indicator of a car that is in the third hundred rating.

True, many car enthusiasts do not really look at the ratings, because it is a net arithmetic counting of feedback, taking into account the general opinion of people by type of total temperature in the hospital. Yes, and if you look at the number of reviews, for example, in terrano - this is about 2.5 thousand, and only 30 real owners for which the points were calculated, then this "rating" could not be an objective assessment of one and another car .

Read also

Hyundai Cretage or Casca: Comparative Overview
Fans of "Asians" sometimes fall into prostration, when they have to make a choice in favor of Korean Hyundai or the "Japanese" Nissan, and rather, what do you still prefer the SUV, Hyundai Kretka or Casca? Here without ...

Reviews of Nissan Terrano

Advantages:

• good design;
• has a high ground clearance;
• has a spacious salon;
• good review;
• sensitivity of the steering wheel and pedals;
• has two emergency pillows;
• volume trunk;
• good factory motor protection;
• small flow;
• in winter, no problems start;
• good permeability;
• high, reliable inexpensive;
• long warranty period.

Disadvantages:

• small mirrors;
• small magnetic screen;
• tissue upholstery of the cabin;
• there is no electric lifting of glasses in passengers;
• weak noise insulation;
• It is expensive and incomprehensible, according to which principle its schedule is installed: first 10 thousand, then 16, and on the third year 14 thousand runs.

Reviews on Hyundai Prost

Advantages:

• the suspension is excellent;
• large wheels and modern body view;
• well enters the turn;
• the stove warms well;
• there is heated steering, as well as all seats;
• comfortable, comfortable and soft car.

Disadvantages:

As a result

There are no striking differences between these crossovers. This is if they keep in mind the cars themselves. There are differences in what users they are most suitable for. For those like nature and outdoor activities, in general for energetic people, Nissen Terrano - just right.

As for Hyundai Cret, this crossover can be perfectly suitable for women, and men who are not "missed" false prejudices and complexes.

Both of these machines are designed for people who have wealth on average and below average.

Experienced motorists know that today the leading crossovers in the automotive world are Asian models. In this article, we oppose Hyundai Creta and Nissan Terrano, after which we define what is better - terrano or coat.

Appearance

When studying appearance Car managed to notice that they have some common moments. For example, it is dynamic, and asian conservatism. However, in the exterior terrano there is more aggressiveness and energetic. Greta looks calmer, but the appearance of the car is boring exactly.

From the front of Creta is the corporate fiddle radiator, compact headlights and a powerful bumper. Side I. rear end Can not offer something unusual. The same can be said about the Japanese opponent. The front of the terrano is equipped with a huge radiator lattice, large headlights and a voluminous bumper.

Creta or Terrano? Given the fact that the Japanese looks fresh, it will give it preference in this point.

Salon

In general, the layout of the Salon of crossovers also has a lot in common, but it concerns the external outlines. After all, if you look at, you can find out that the inner decoration terrano marks noticeably visited, especially in terms of processability. In the Salon "Japanese" installed a branded dashboard with a large touchscreen display and a practical steering wheel.

Prita panel primitively, but it can be perceived as dignity, since there are no extra elements that could distract the driver while driving.

If we talk about finishing materials, the Japanese crossover is a clear favorite.
Terrano or coat? Undoubtedly, this is Nissan Terrano.

Specifications

The situation with the "car" filling is very ambiguous. On the one hand, the terrano bus line can offer a larger range of engines than a price, but the Japanese is significantly weaker.

Judge for yourself: gasoline aggregates at 1.6 and 2.0 liters give 102 and 135 horsepower, and 1.5-liter diesel - 90 "horses". For comparison, gasoline power plants of the Korean car at 1.6 and 2.0 liters give out the capacity of 123 and 149 horsepower. Naturally, it affects both dynamism, therefore, in this aspect, give the advantage of Creta.

Prices

Those who wish to acquire Greta will have to post at least 800 thousand rubles. His Japanese opponent will cost 765 thousand rubles. Based on this, the advantage will give the Japanese Parquet.

Output

Immediately it can be noted that the Japanese designers have tried more, and better issued an external, as well as the inner decoration of the car. Korean manufacturers decided to donate appearance and threw all their efforts on the technical characteristics that were really chic. Considering this, it does not seem strange that terrano is 35 thousand rubles cheaper than their opponent.

Creta or Terrano? If we summarize, then when choosing one of these parkets, we recommend paying attention to the "Japanese".