» »

What is better Ford Focus 2 or Opel Astra. Car Comparison Sedan Ford Focus II and Hatchback Opel Astra H

10.10.2020

When it comes to acquire a new car, each of us comes from the amount he can spend. And the inevitable comparison of Odnoklassniki begins. It is quite fair and understandable, because anyone wants to buy "as much car for
this money". Consider two
"Odnoklassniki": what to buy - Ford Focus or Opel Astra?

Exterior body design

Opel Astra

Opel Astra design can be defined as smooth, with a claim for elegance, in the style of "Unisex". There is a desire for developers to please and please representatives of both sexes. Ford Focus has a third generation, on the contrary, there was a more dynamic, daring, with a hint of sportiness, design. The image of the car has become more aggressive. Naturally, the design is subjective, and each, based on their preferences, will decide for yourself, which of them is more beautiful - Opel Astra or Ford Focus. And everyone will be right!

Ford Focus 3.

Interior Salon

Inside the cabin car Opel Astra is also more planted and elegant. The elegantly curved line torpedo, as if ongoing on the front doors, as if he wants to hug a person. The material of the finish (plastic, the upholstery) is perfectly flawless. The interior of the Ford Focus salon consists of polyhedra, broken and sharp lines. But the "cosmic" style is destructed clearly and looks organically.

Opel Astra H Sedan

Comfort level

Opel Astra suspension is more sensitive, it is better to swallow irregularities on the way, but also noisy: blows on serious irregularities, as well as the hum of the motor penetrate the salon. The focus of the third generation has noticeably added in the level of comfort, compared with its predecessor. In any case, to the question "Whose noise insulation is better: Opel Astra or Ford Focus?", Answer is unequivocal - Ford Focus.

Ford focus sedan

Trunk size

Visually, on the eye, it is almost impossible to determine whose trunk is spacious. But careful detailed measurement revealed, whose trunk is a little more. The leader in this indicator is Opel Astra. But focus is a full-size spare wheel, and Astra has only a dock.

Engines, configuration and prices

Opel Astra in our market is available with three engine variants. This is a 1.4 liter turbocharged 140-strong unit; 1.6 liter with 115 l / s and 1.6 liter turbo engine from 180 l / s. Ford Focus is offered with a 105-strong 1.6 liter; 125-strong 1.6 liters. and 150-strong two-liter gasoline engines. There is also a two-liter 140-strong turbo diesel.

For the price of the base, the focus equipment is much cheaper than the Olympic base. When choosing Ford, the view immediately falls on the premium configuration "Trend Sport" and "Titanium". But the prices for top packs "Astra" are generally chosen beyond equal competition. In general, the prices of the "stuffed" configuration of Ford Focus are comparable to the prices of basic Opel packages, - that is, at the prices of Ford Focus taxis.

The conclusion at all comparisons is still one: making the final choice, you need to trust primarily your personal preferences and your intuition. After all, you end up on this car. But for this, it is important to collect the maximum amount of information, and then the correct solution will pop up by itself, as a slice of bread from the toaster.

"I want to buy a 5-door hatchback from 6000 to $ 7000. I consider Opel Astra, Fiat Punto, Fiat Bravo, Ford Focus. Conditions:" Mechanics ", Motor volume - 1.6-1.8 l."

And let's start crossing both FIAT models! Nothing personal, simple and bravo, and the Punto of the generations under consideration is equipped with gasoline engines with a volume of up to 1.4 liters, which does not fit into the author's requirements (rare powerful versions of BRAVO do not count, especially since they are not visible on our "secondary") . In addition, Punto refers to the European segment in and is visibly inferior in size (respectively, according to the inner space), as well as the level of comfort by three other models representing the golf class.

So we suggest focusing in two models - Opel Astra H and Ford Focus II. Note that both cars repeatedly became the heroes of our publications, in which we considered their technical features and disadvantages in detail. So now go through the main points and compare the models.

Body

Focus over time loses its commodity look: paint is muddling, and somewhere even sees. In addition, there may be problems with rust, but in most cases it is the wines of the previous owners who did not follow the body and did not eliminate the minor foci of corrosion in the area of \u200b\u200bdamage to the LCP and Zinc.

Astra's paintwork is also not highlighted by a lot of resistance to mechanical effects, so over time in the most vulnerable to the exposure to sandblasting and other damage to places can also appear point foci of corrosion. But frankly rotting Astra H is an extremely rare phenomenon.

Engines


In the case of FOCUS, we would not recommend "chasing" for a 1.8-liter engine, even despite the greater power and chain drive timing. First, there is enough problems with the stability of work, which is to blame the ignition system, then the throttle is the control unit, then the control unit. Secondly, often after 200 thousand km, an autopsy is required due to the occurring oil-free rings.

So it is better to pay attention to the 1.6-liter option. Yes, 115-strong version Ti-VCT until 2007. I had questions with the reliability of the coupling system of changing the phases of gas distribution, and in general the "phase" no, no, and remind themselves, although it may also matter as maintenance and oil used. But the old 100-strong engine is hardly worth considering buying, as it is weak with almost the same level of reliability.

At one time, the 1.6-liter Ecotec x16xel (101 hp), the one that was installed on Astra G, pretty spoiled the reputation of the increased consumption of engine oil due to the premature wear of the valve sleeves. But the 115-strong Motor Z16XER from this lack is delighted, so it's not worth the fear of this option, a choice between it and a 140-strong 1.8 Z18XER engine (both engines in these modifications appeared on Astra H in 2006) in terms of reliability is not fundamental .

Also, both engines with distributed fuel injection can be considered quite attractive from the point of view of maintainability and cost of repair costs. And the weak points of them are common - this is a ignition module facing the sensors, far from the most reliable wiring. In addition, the engines are sensitive to the quality of engine oil and the timing of its replacement. In general, the selection criterion can be either the technical condition of a particular copy, or differences in the characteristics: the 1.8-liter engine is more powerful, but also a little "voracious".

Transmissions


The IB5 mechanical box on Focus did not differ in high reliability. And this is another argument in favor of the 1.6-liter version, although there may be necessary to repair with time, however, it is most likely to be limited to the replacement of synchronizers.

The F17 mechanical box used on the ASTRA with the motors under consideration is also far from ideal: there are not so rare cases of its premature failure during runs up to 200 thousand km and on cars under 10 years old. Therefore, before buying, be sure to check whether the operation is accompanied by the operation of the transmission with increased noise or outsiders. Moreover, on the more powerful 1.8-liter engine "death" of the differential and bearings of the shafts to provoke much easier - in this sense, the 1.6-liter option is also slightly "safer".

Suspension

In the undercarriage of FOCUS, the front hub bearings is relatively short-lived, and when there are over 100 thousand miles, it may be necessary to the rear "multi-phase" rear, and this operation due to the abundance of parts may seem unexpectedly expensive.

Unlike Focus, a more simple semi-dependent beam is applied at the Astra. In front - too, if not eternal, then just inexpensive in McPherson repair. So support the suspension in working condition is not at all burdensome. But here the exception is not enough durable and pretty expensive hub bearings, replaceable with the hub. But in any case, Opel's suspension issues should be less.

Pulse prices


As the analysis shows, with a budget of 6000-7000 $, it is possible to consider the purchase of Opel Astra H and Ford Focus II 2008-2009, although there are also more recent copies. At the same time, the price level on FOCUS is slightly lower, which allows or save, or choose a later year of production with other things being equal.

Our verdict

Both models are close not only in their technical characteristics, but also in terms of reliability, as well as the cost of content. In both cases, we recommend considering the purchase of 1.6-liter versions - they initially have fewer questions both by the motor itself and boxes. Otherwise, everything rests on the technical condition of the specimens under consideration.

Ivan Krishkevich
website

You have questions? We have to have answers. The topics you are interested in qualifying or specialists, or our authors - the result you will see the site on the site. Leave questions or use the "Write to Editors" button

Hello, friends!

Today we continue the series of comparisons of cars - classmates. In the queue - products of the European Auto industry: Opel Astra Series J and Ford Focus Third Generation.

So what is better, Ford Focus and Opel Astra? We understand together!

Exterior Ford Focus and Opel Astra

The Ford Focus of the Third Generation is the embodiment of the ideas of the manufacturer aimed at improving aerodynamic indicators, which affected the external appearance of the car. Soft, streamlined forms contribute to improving the aesthetics of the model. A light shade of aggressiveness gives the car solidity. The front headlights acquired a "predatory look", and in combination with tumshots of the trapezoidal form and the updated grid of the radiator A la Aston Martin, it can be rightfully called the "predator" of roads. The model is offered to Russian buyers with three types of body: 4-door sedan, 5-door hatchback and wagon:

Ford Focus 3 Sedan Body

Ford Focus 3 with Body Universal and Hatchback

"Opel Astra" j has more classical outlines, signs of German stability and reliability? The grille of the radiator of a new design, oblong headlights and modern stylish fog-tumanks - all this, in the complex, gave the car the dynamics of the image, elegance and awareness on the road. Before caring from the market, the model was offered to Russian buyers with four body types: 4-door sedan, 5-door hatchback and station wagon, 3-door merchant hatchback:

Interior: "Opel Astra" or "Ford Focus 3"

Salon "Opel Astra" J is made in classic dark colors. Seat material wear-resistant, on request - leatherette. Color, in basic configuration, gray.

The front console is made of differential plastics, in terms of the quality of materials and ergonomics as a whole, it objectively loses "focus". The dashboard with chrome-plated digital edging devices looks stylish and rich. Due to the soft backlight, all the indicators are visible perfectly.

The screen of the on-board computer is located between the tachometer and speedometer. And in the top versions, in the upper part of the central console there is a large display of multimediasystems and navigation.

In expensive versions on the steering wheel there is a climate control management console, telephone calls, an audio system. On the rear seats "Astra" is spacious than in "focus".

The "Ford Focus 3" draws attention to the quality and at the same time practical material. Seats are covered with water-repellent cloth, and in the top versions there is an opportunity to order a combined upholstery with inserts from high-quality leatherette. The color of the salon finishes buyer can choose at its discretion: from creamy to dark gray.

The modern and stylish dashboard is convenient to monitor the testimony of devices without being distracted by driving a car.

The steering wheel in expensive versions is equipped with the onboard system control panel, starting with the control of the multimedia system and ending with the on-board computer settings that are responsible for the comfortable use of the car. There is the possibility of voice control a number of functions of multimediasystem. The focus is more convenient for the front seats than in Astra.

The volume of the Ford Focus trunk is: for a sedan - 372 liters (one of the smallest trunkings in the classroom), for the hatchback - from 277 liters (with undressed rear seats) to 1062 liters in a transformed form (with folded rear armchairs), for a station wagon - from 476 to 1502 liters.

Opel Astra's trunk in all cases More: For a sedan - quite decent 460 liters, for a 5-door hatchback - from 370 liters (with undressed rear seats) to 1235 liters in a transformed form (with folded rear armchairs), for a wagon - from 500 up to 1550 liters.

Specifications Ford Focus

Engine type on most models Ford Focus - atmospheric, 1.6 liter volume, which by the way are now produced in Russia, at the new Motor Ford Sollers factory in Elabuga, with a large share of details and raw materials of Russian origin. We wrote about it. Depending on the level of forsing, it develops 85 hp (Such a motor is placed only on the hatchback in the base version, exclusively with 5-speed mechanics, from 834 thousand rubles), as well as 105 and 125 hp, these two power units can be combined with 5-speed MCPP (from 971 and 1 million 006 thousand rubles, respectively) and with a 6-speed "robotic" checkpoint (from 1 million 011 thousand rubles and 1 million 046 thousand rubles, respectively). And on the top of the gamma - the 150-housing turbo engine EcoBoost, which is combined exclusively with a 6-speed classic "automatic" (from 1 million 196 thousand rubles).

The ecoBoost family turbo engine appeared on Russian Ford Focus quite recently, it pleases an excellent product with low fuel consumption.

Specifications Opel Astra J

Opel Astra Generation J is also preferably equipped with a 1.6 liter gasoline engine, but only with one level of forsing (115 hp). And in recent years, before leaving the brand from the Russian market (perhaps in solidarity with Western sanctions?), Turbops were actively supplied with a volume of 1.4 liters (140 hp) or 1.6 liters (170 hp for station wool and 3-door hatchback, or 180 hp for sedan and 5-door hatchback), occasionally met a 2-liter turbodiesel with a capacity of 130 hp "Astra" was equipped with a selection of a mechanical five-speed gearbox or automatic six-speed.

All engines on Opel Astra belonged to the Ecotec family

Test Drive Ford Focus and Opel Astra

When conducting a joint test drive, it turned out that both models confidently feel on the road. The difference is manifested only in the nuances and not too large. In general, Ford Focus is slightly better in terms of controllability, he is smallerly launched on the bins and at acceleration, delivers more "driver's pleasure" (while we leave 3-door "Astra" for the scenes). The usual Opel Astra behave a little more comfortable on our roads, compared to "focus", less reacting to a different road trifle.

Summarize: Ford Focus or Opel Astra

And according to technical parameters, and on behavior on the road both models are pretty close. When choosing the main issue there may be personal preferences, some of the nuances of the differences - which was described above. And most importantly, Ford Focus continues to be in the Russian market, this means including the best availability of service and the availability of spare parts, a greater selection of models in the secondary market. At the same time, Opel Astra has a considerable number of fans who appreciated the interesting design of the machine, and a rather successful total balance of the quality of the car. And what to choose, to solve you, maybe some of my comments will be useful for you.

Mazda3 and Mitsubishi Lancer Machines for an active ride, and Ford Focus and Opel Astra are in demand in pragmatic and practical people.

The most expensive model is Mazda3, and the most accessible - Mitsubishi Lancer. Ford Focus and Opel Astra stand almost the same and in the price range are between the two "Japanese". With the amount of 100 thousand UAH, you can purchase Ford Focus and Opel Astra 2007 or Mazda3 for 2 years older than everyone else from them (2008) Mitsubishi Lancer. Focus and Mazda3 are created on a common platform and use some identical details and nodes.

Ford Focus Mazda3. Mitsubishi Lancer. Opel Astra.
common data
Body type sedan sedan sedan sedan
Doors / seats 4/5 4/5 4/5 4/5
Dimensions, d / sh / in, mm 4490/1840/1455 4490/1755/1465 4480/1695/1445 4587/1753/1458
Base, mm. 2640 2640 2600 2703
Mass Curb / Full, kg 1230/1775 1235/1745 1205/1750 1314/1740
The volume of the trunk, l 465/525 420/675 430 / ND. 490/870
Volume of tank, l 55 55 50 52
Engines
Petrol 4-cylinder.: 1.4 l 16V (80 hp), 1.6 l 16V (100 hp) 1.6 l 16V (115 hp), 2.0 l 16V (145 hp) 1.6 l 16V (105 hp), 2.0 l 16V (150 hp) 1.6 l 16V (98 hp), 1.8 l 16V (140 hp), 2.0 l 16V (135 hp) 1.6 l 16V (115 hp), 1.8 l 16V (140 hp)
Diesel 4-cylinder.: 1.6 L 16V TURBO (90/109 hp), 2.0 l 16V Turbo (136 hp) 1.7 l 16V (110 hp)
Transmission
type of drive front. front. front. front.
KP 5-art. fur. or 4th. Auto 5- or 6-st. fur. or 4th. Auto 5-art. fur. or 4th. Auto 5- and 6-st. fur., 5-st. robot. fur..
Chassis
Front brakes / rear disk. / Disk. disk. / Disk. disk. / Disk. disk. / Disk.
Front / rear suspension unqualified / independent. unqualified / independent. unqualified / independent. unqualified / independent.
Tires 195/65 R15, 205/55 R16, 205/50 R17 195/65 R15, 205/55 R16 195/60 R15, 195/50 R16 205/55 R16.

Ford Focus II 2004-2011 in. from 77.6 thousand UAH. Until 134.4 thousand UAH.

Mazda3 2003-2009 in. from 80 thousand UAH. Until 136 thousand UAH.

Mitsubishi Lancer IX 2002-2009 in. from 68 thousand UAH. up to 108 thousand UAH.

Opel Astra (N) since 2007. from 100 thousand UAH to 152 thousand UAH


The character correspond!

Taking into account the active temperament "Troika" and Lancer with more powerful engines in the secondary market there is a risk of purchasing an instance restored after the accident. Therefore, we recommend pursuing a qualified diagnosis of the state of their body. Regarding corrosion resistance, most complaints about Mazda3, and as of other body parts - to Astra and also "Troika". The most (5 stars of Euroncap) - the "Germans" (the remaining models for this discipline are weaker).

All car salons are ready to take five crew members - while most convenient will be in Opel - it is characterized by the largest wheelbase, this advantage was used by designers to improve the comfort of the rear passengers. And the least spacious salon at Lancer. The practicality of the "Germans" is confirmed and more spacious than the trunk compared to the Japanese. The largest in Astra is 490 liters, slightly smaller at Focus - 465 L (against 420 liters of Mazda3 and 430 liters of Lancer). Chiticus Opel Should except for a narrowed opening of access to the salon with a folded rear seats.

In low-cost versions of Focus, the quality of the plastic finish is low - it is hard and with time can annoy the creak. The visibility is limited to the front racks, lowered rear glass and high "feed".

Plastic finishes on the view of the road, but to the touch is hard, the benefit of he is non-disc. Noise insulation of the engine compartment and wheeled niches is weak. In August 2003-2004 in. There may be due to the information display on the torpedo and the front airbag sensor.

Plastic finishing hardish, but non-inclusive. Noise insulation is weak, and visibility is limited only at the versions of Sport with a regular rear anti-car. But all the cabin equipment reliably and works without problems.

Plastic salon quality, even with time inside, nothing creaks. Soundproofing of the engine compartment is weak. The main advantage of the salon is one of the largest in the class of place for the feet of the rear passengers.

Invalid stereotype

Under the hood of both "Japanese" - only gasoline engines, while "Germans" have more economical diesel versions, however, they are less common. From the purchase of Focus with a motor 1.6 TDI it is better to refrain - it is short-lived. Among the gasoline power units, the least problems are revealed in the Ford and Opel engines.

The most popular motor in all cars is 1.6 liter gasoline. By comparing the dynamic data indicators of versions with "Mechanics", declared by manufacturers, we found out that more accurately corresponds to him "Troika" - it is the fastest and accelerate to "hundreds" for 11.2 s, and Lancer, despite the image of the car for an active ride It turned out to be the most slow - 12.1 s (Focus - 11.9 s and Astra - 11.7 s). Comments on gearboxes are available to all models.

Pendants of these cars are shot down and well suited for an active ride. The Focus feature is his rear "multi-dimension" due to special silent blocks is endowed with the effect of passive infringement. Because of this, on uneven roads, the back often rearranges. To unambiguously say, the chassis of which car is most durable, difficult. In the pendants of each model, weaknesses are revealed, which will have to be repaired during runs at 40-80 thousand km.

There are no complaints about the reliability of the steering only at Opel, while the steering thrust Astra and Lancer (1.6 liters) serve less than the other machines - 70-80 thousand km and 40-80 thousand km, respectively. Brake comments There are only 2.0-liter versions of Lancer Sport.

Ford Focus II.

In general, the Focus body is well protected from corrosion. Many cars are sold without protective mudguards, and if they do not additionally install them, with time paint on the thresholds and the lower parts of the door sandblasting.

Plastic finishes of cheap and expensive versions differs - in the first it is less than high quality. Behind the most convenientness will be the people of medium physique. Over time, glass windows begin to creak (lubricant required), and the air conditioner radiator needs periodic cleaning (otherwise it loses the tightness of the tube between the compressor and the radiator).

The most common unit is 1.6 liters (gasoline. And diesel.). The characteristic problem of "gasoline" is throttle. 1.6 TDI is characterized by a small resource - the cylindropional group is wearing 100 thousand km, oil consumption increases. The ACP is reliable, and the MCP "sins" leaks of oil.
The suspension moderately rigid, but energy-intensive. On uneven roads, the back often rearranges. The resource of the rear multi-dimensions is large, but a number of parts of the front suspension are not distinguished by durability. At the same time, the ball and silent blocks of the front levers can run about 150 thousand km. Over time, can disturb and steering.

pros

Minuses

  • High passive security
  • The high resource of most engines (no problems go 400-500 thousand km)
  • Energy intensive chassis
  • Durable rear suspension (it can serve almost 200 thousand km) and steering (even the tips of the steering traction go at least 100 thousand km) good handling
  • Single brakes
  • Corrosion Light Backlight Rooms
  • Remarks to visibility
  • Script plastic parts (cheap versions) and windows
  • Loss of tightness of intercooler pipelines and ventilation of crankcase gases (TDI), air conditioner tubes and power steering, seafrine glands and KP
  • Throttle problems in gasoline engines (cleaning or replacement)
  • Increased oil consumption after 100 thousand km (1.6 TDI)
  • The briefness of the front shock absorbers ("sweating" by oil after 60 thousand km) and bearings: supporting front racks (crunch after 40 thousand km), right semi-axes (80 thousand km), hubs (can go to 80 thousand km.)

Summary "AC"

Used Focus is comfortable, convenient, practical and endowed with good sketches. Although the reliability and durability of some nodes and aggagats (details of the suspension, transmission and turbo diesel engine 1.6 liters) there are serious comments.

Claims for corrosion resistance concern only dorestayling versions, issued until 2006, in addition, is Mazda3 and a number of comments to the state of some body details.
The interior design reflects the active direction of the model. Many versions are well equipped. At the same time, you can criticize the quality of noise insulation and ergonomics of landing on the gallery.

Officially sold only gasoline versions. The most common is the 1.6-liter versions that have proven themselves as more reliable. The unit 2.0 liters can create problems. There are no comments to both types of CP. Only clutch on 1,6-liter cars and some details of the transmission on versions of 2003-2005 can be disturbed. Thanks to a knocked suspension and an informative steering Mazda3, it is great for an active ride. Weak places of chassis: transverse levers of the rear "multi-dimensions", support pillows pillows and stabilizer racks. The remaining consumables serve 100-200 thousand km. Remarks to the reliability of the electric power steering concerns only 2.0-liter versions. At the same time, the steering thrust of all versions is durable - about 150 thousand km can go.

pros

Minuses

  • Expressive appearance and interior design
  • On the market it is easy to find versions both with "mechanics" and "machine". Both aggregates have proven themselves as reliable
  • Excellent chassis contributes to active ride
  • Steering informative, and brakes - effective and trouble-free
  • Durable steering traction
  • Rust Wheel Arches (versions until 2006), the rear shoes are destroyed, the plastic mudguard of the engine compartment is broken in winter with non-accurant operation. The rear optics is found, door locks are knocking. Small trunk.
  • Given the active temperament a high risk to purchase an instance restored after the accident
  • Weak noise insulation of the engine compartment and wheeled niches. The failure of the information display and the front airbag sensor (version 2003-2004). The opening of the rear doors is aligned with a rack and pillow of a sofa
  • The choice of engines is limited by gasoline engines. Problems with intake manifold (wear of the damper of the system of the geometry of the intake path), the sensitivity to the quality of fuel (motors 2.0 l)
  • The leaks of the clutch working cylinder (1.6 l). Platform in the slotted compound "Grenades" and hubs (versions of 2003-2005 in.)
  • Digital support pillows front racks (50 thousand km), transverse levers of rear "multi-dimensions" (40 thousand km) and rear stabilizer racks (60 thousand km)
  • Electromotor power steering in versions of 2.0 liters per car 2006-2009. In the heat when moving in traffic jam, overheats and turns off (changes with dealers for free)
  • Unimportant stability on uneven roads (due to the piring rear multi-dimensions, the back often rearranges)

Summary "AC"

Mazda3 is popular with the beautiful half of society and lovers of an active ride. 2.0-liter versions can not be worn out to be measated with temperamental owners. Buying better cars since 2006, in which many "children's diseases" were eliminated. Some pendant details are short-lived.

Mitsubishi Lancer IX.

The secondary market there are "gray" versions from the Asian and American markets - Virage and Mirage (more often than 2002-2004). The advantage - they are equipped with the richer "Europeans".

At the Lancer until 2006, check the lock cover of the trunk - it can be twisted because of the water falling into it. The functionality of the use of the freight compartment is limited to a narrow "neck" opening of access to the cabin with a folded rear seats. In the rear sofa, three passengers will be closed, a small supply of place and for the feet of the rear passengers.

Officially, we were sold versions with 1.6 L gasoline engines and 2.0 liters. Motor 1.8 liters occurs among the "gray" versions. There are characteristic problems for each of the power units. MCP and ACP are reliable, troubles may occur with "mechanics" only from excessively active drivers. More problematic clutch for versions with a 1.6 liter engine.

A good suspension provides good stability and handling. Weaknesses of the chassis: ball supports of the front levers, front stabilizer bushings, upper support pillows rear shock absorbers, rear springs (1.6 l) floating outdoor silent blocks of three transverse levers (2.0 l to 2005). The remaining consumables serve for 100 thousand km. There are also comments to the reliability of the steering and brakes.

pros

Minuses

  • Affordable market value
  • Good corrosion resistance
  • Reliable salon equipment
  • Modern adaptive ACP. "Automatic" trouble-free
  • Suspension settings enjoy active ride
  • Sport versions could be in an accident and can be worn out. Weak noise insulation. It is possible to subdink the lock of the trunk cover (until 2006). Narrow opening of access to the salon from the trunk. Small volume of cargo compartment
  • At the Sport versions, the back is a bit limit to the regular anti-cycle. Hard plastic finishes. Throw for three gallery, a small reserve place for the rear passengers
  • The choice of engines is limited by gasoline engines. Sample of candle tips, failure of the sparks and catalyst candles (1.6 liters)
  • With an active ride, it is possible to burn synchronizers and clutch disks (MCP with a 2.0 l engine). Difficulties with the repair of the variator (with an engine 1.8 l)
  • Due to low-profile versions of Sport and low-quality roads, the sidewalls of tires are torn. The short service life of the ball supports (80 thousand km), floating silent blocks of the rear suspension (30-50 thousand km), the upper supporting pillows of the rear shock absorbers (50 thousand km). Sewing rear springs (1.6 liters). Expensive service "running"
  • Unreliable rail (broken), a small resource (40-80 thousand km) of the tips of the steering (version 1.6 l). Knock in calipers (2.0 l versions)

Summary "AC"

Mitsubishi Lancer is able to attract buyers affordable market value, resistant to corrosion by the body and the image of the driver model, supported by good driving qualities. Although the practicality of the Lancer is lame: the volume of the trunk is small, and the "gallery" is not an opposite. Yes, and reliability - does not correspond to the image of Japanese cars.

Opel Astra (H)

In general, the corrosion resistance of the body is not bad. The only weak point where rust may appear - the trunk lid under a chrome decorative lining. There are also several comments to the state of other body parts.

Salon, in particular a gallery, very spacious for legs due to the fact that the sedan wheel base is one of the largest among Odnoklassniki and even 3 mm more than Vectra (C). The interior is performed high quality, most of the equipment works without problems.

Most often we have cars equipped with a 1.6 liter gasoline engine. "Petrol" 1.8 l and turbodiesel 1.7 liters are the most rare. Popular gasoline can fail the ignition coil. "Mechanics" is trouble-free, and the "robot" is distinguished by thoughtfulness "in work, and also requires regular (every 15 thousand km) clutch adjustment (including after the bounce). If this is not done, the clutch and two-mask flywheel can come into disrepair to 50 thousand km.
The running moderately rigid and provides good stability and handling. A number of parts of the suspension has a short service life. At the same time, the silent blocks of the front levers can withstand about 100 thousand km, and the balls are even longer. "The gum" of the rear beam also is considered "elastic bands".

pros

Minuses

  • The possibility of acquiring both "favor" and a new car
  • High passive security
  • One of the largest in class rear passengers
  • The luggage compartment is one of the most accomplished among competitors.
  • Reliable motors of 1.6 and 1.8 liters
  • Self-traditional mechanical KP and brake system
  • Good stability and handling
  • Corrosion is possible on the trunk lid, fogging the rear optics (version 2008-2009 in.), Problems with the mechanism of the front wipers, peeling the chrome coating on the radiator grille
  • The failure of the driver's airbag. Skinny open access to the salon
  • May lose tightness oil pressure sensor. In the use of poor-quality gasoline, individual ignition coils may fail
  • Capricious and "Pensive" in the work of robotic KP Easytronic
  • Hard suspension. A small durability of the stabilizer (20-30 thousand km), supporting bearings of the front racks (30-40 thousand km), rear shock absorbers (40-50 thousand km), steering (70-80 thousand km). Breakfast rear springs. Hourly replacement of wheel bearings (along with hubs and ABS sensors)

Summary "AC"

The chief trump card of the Astra sedan (H) compared to competitors is a spacious salon in which the rear passengers will be delighted randomly than most competitors. When buying it is better to choose versions with reliable "mechanics". The suspension does not like overloads, and some of its details are short-lived.

If you have found a mistake, please select the text fragment and click Ctrl + Enter..

What is better Ford Focus or Opel?

It means that I am Ford Focus 1.0 EcoBoost per 100 horses, chose it because I think it is better!
The choice was as follows:
  • Choosing between a large number of C-class representatives, I wanted something to be so special, but at the same time not screaming about yourself, such as Honda Civic;
  • reliable and conservative, but not Volkswagen Golf, Opel Astra;
  • something bright, but not Peugeot Citroen, somehow they look like a female and go, there is no drive at all.
Ford Focus - a time-tested car, popular in Europe, America and we have what is most important. Fresh, stylish, golden middle between style and conservatism.

Interior Ford Focus

In the cabin immediately rushed into the eyes of excellent ergonomics, everything is at hand, concise and informative. The feeling of security and collens, sat down, went without thinking.
It can be seen that the interior was worked out by people who know their business. The quality of plastic for this money is 5-. Everything likes everything in the cabin, but the places behind the back might be more.

Hanging impressions

Focus rides, as if glued to the road, the entrance in turns is excellent, the steering is clear, the steering wheel is poured with weight gain, safety is above all.
Suspension, as the driver car believes is harsh. Yes, and damn with him. Rides perfectly!

Heart Ford

The engine volume is only 1 liter, but with a turbine, gives exactly 100 hp, the dynamics of 12.5 seconds certainly does not please, but fuel consumption in 6 liters in the city - lines this deficiency.
On the highway, it was possible to reach 4 liters per 100 km, rightly 2 times, when 90 km / h and the rest rode all the way, 4.5-5 liters.
Problems from Ford Focus with whom I encountered
The steering ray once changed under warranty, the stabilizers changed. The rest is in order. Nowhere does not knock, do not creak. Mileage 39,000 km. Car satisfied.